Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 5;12:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-48

Table 5.

Spatial genetic structure, Sp statistics and estimates of gene flow distances in four eastern white cedar populations

Region Population ^F1 ^F2 ^F3 ^F4 ^F5 b-log (^bF) Sp Nb σg (m) (De/D = 0.1) σg (m) (De/D = 0.5)
Core ED 0.047* -0.013* -0.001 -0.001 -0.008 -0.017* 0.018 56.73 98.29 43.96
PA 0.015* 0.004 0.006 0.008 -0.013 -0.009* 0.009 106.41 119.98 53.66
Peripheral CL 0.045* 0.023* 0.003 -0.008 -0.005 -0.015* 0.016 64.00 167.32 74.83
RL 0.070* 0.027* 0.026* 0.015* 0.014* -0.029* 0.031 32.08 103.14 46.13
Average core 0.031 0.004 0.003 0.004 -0.011 -0.013 0.014 81.57 109.14 48.81
Average peripheral 0.057 0.025 0.015 0.004 0.005 -0.022 0.023 48.04 135.23 60.48

^F1, ^F2, ^F3, ^F4 and ^F5: mean kinship coefficient (Fij) [57] between individuals belonging to the first (0-15 m), second (15-30 m), third (30- 45 m), fourth (45-60 m) and fifth (60-75 m) distance classes, respectively; b-log (^bF): Slope of the regression of kinship with ln(dist); Sp: statistic defined by the ratio _^bF/(1 - ^F1), where ^bF is the regression slope of the autocorrelogram; ^F1 is the mean kinship coefficient (Fij) between individuals belonging to the first (0-15 m) distance class [20]; Nb Wright's neighbourhood size; σg, estimate of gene flow distance from Sp, assuming different ratios of effective (De) to census density (D); *, significant (P < 0.05)

ED, Edmundston; PA, Perth Andover; CL, Cedar Lake; RL, Rockland