The Pd-catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reaction, which employs air- and moisture-stable organoboronic acids,1 is among the most valued of methods for C–C bond formation in organic synthesis. A broad range of electrophiles undergo cross-couplings with organoboronic acids, including alkyl, aryl, alkenyl, and alkynyl groups. However, reports on allylic partners, such as acetates, carbonates, halides and pseudohalides, are rare.2,3 Generally, a monodentate phosphine is required to obtain a π-allylpalladium intermediate, which subsequently undergoes smooth transmetalation with arylboronic acids. Coordinatively saturated π-allylpalladium intermediates having bidentate phosphine ligands tend to slow transmetalation, since a π-allylpalladium species must rearrange to a σ-allylpalladium complex prior to transmetalation (Scheme 1). However, σ-allylpalladium species are stable only in the presence of bulky ligands (e.g., pincer ligands).4 Thus, while phosphines typically promote oxidative addition, they may inhibit transmetalation. 5 This subtle phenomenon is still somewhat controversial but could be one explanation for the limited development of Suzuki–Miyaura couplings with allylic fragments. Recent related progress in this area includes the use of allylic trifluoroborates as nucleophiles; these have been applied to asymmetric cross-coupling reactions by Yamamoto and Miyaura.6 Sawamura has described γ-selective couplings between allylic acetates and arylboronic acids in heated chlorinated media.7 A number of issues remain to be addressed, including (1) development of reactions with functionalized allylic fragments, (2) couplings that involve allylic electrophiles other than carbonyl-containing esters and carbonates, (3) solutions to regiochemical issues, and (4) the discovery of “greener” processes that can be conducted under environmentally benign conditions.
Scheme 1.

Transmetalation between π- or σ-Allylpalladium and Arylboronic Acid
Although oxidative addition of Pd(0) to electron-deficient bonds [e.g., C–X or C–OC(O)R] is facile, insertion into electron-rich functionality such as C–OH (or C-OR)3,8 or into C–H bonds9 is particularly challenging. There are no general methods that rely on allylic ethers,2j,3b,10,11 in spite of their advantageous stability under acidic or basic aqueous conditions and toward nucleophilic attack. Only recently have Kakiuchi and Chatani found nickel or ruthenium to be an efficient catalyst for couplings of arylboronic acids with aryl ethers.12 Herein we disclose the first Suzuki–Miyaura couplings with functionalized allylic ethers at ambient temperatures. This new methodology, which is conducted in water as the only medium, is made possible by micellar catalysis using the nonionic amphiphile PTS (Scheme 2).13
Scheme 2.

Cross-Couplings with Allylic Ethers in Water at rt
Optimization studies employed the combination of cinnamyl phenyl ether (1a, 0.25 mmol) and 4-methoxyphenylboronic acid (2a, 0.38 mmol) in the presence of a Pd catalyst in 2 wt % PTS/water at room temperature (Table 1). The effect of the base was examined initially. Although K2CO3 is effective in many Suzuki–Miyaura coupling protocols, only a trace amount of product 3a was obtained (run 1). Use of a strong base, which could assist in transmetalation, is detrimental not only to the goal of mild reaction conditions but also to PTS diester stability. Therefore, several amines were screened (run 2), with triethylamine emerging as the best choice (runs 3–7). The preformed catalyst complex PdCl2(Dt-BPF) gave good conversions; its generation in situ from Pd(OAc)2 and Dt-BPF was notably less effective (run 5). Ultimately, preformed catalyst PdCl2(DPEphos) was identified as the most effective at mediating the coupling in excellent yield (run 7).14
Table 1.
Optimization of Suzuki–Miyaura Couplings with Ethersa
![]() | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| run | catalyst (3 mol %) | base (equiv) | % yield (lin:br) |
| 1 | PdCl2(Dt-BPF) | K2CO3(3) | trace |
| 2 | PdCl2(Dt-BPF) | amineb (3) | trace |
| 3 | PdCl2(Dt-BPF) | Et3N (1.5) | 20 (>25:1) |
| 4 | PdCl2(Dt-BPF) | Et3N (3) | 72 (88)c (>25:1) |
| 5 | Pd(OAc)2/Dt-BPF | Et3N (3) | 33 (>25:1) |
| 6 | PdCl2(Dt-BPF) | Et3N (6) | 78 (99)c (>25:1) |
| 7d | PdCl2(DPEphos) | Et3N (3) | 99 (>25:1) |
Conducted at rt for 6 h in 2% PTS/water with catalyst (3 mol %), base (3 equiv), 2a (1.5 equiv), and 1a.
Bu3N, i-Pr2EtN, N(CH2CH2-OCH2CH2OMe)3, (Me2NCH2)2CH2, or N,N′-dimethylpiperazine.
Run for 18 h.
Run for 5 h using 2 mol % Pd.
As illustrated in Table 2, several boronic acids can be coupled with allylic ether 1a to give linearly coupled products akin to 3a. Generally, ortho-substituted boronic acids, such as 2b, 2c, and 2d, are more reluctant to participate in transmetalation, although on the other hand, once the aryl residue is metal-bound, reductive elimination is expected to occur readily. Under micellar catalysis conditions, the overall sequence led to excellent yields at room temperature within 5 h (runs 1–3). Although PdCl2(DPEphos) was generally useful in this reaction, 4-chlorophenylboronic acid (2e) and 2-thiopheneboronic acid (2f) coupled more readily with 1a in the presence of PdCl2(Dt-BPF) (runs 4 and 5). Arylboronic acid 2g required 6 mol % catalyst to obtain a high yield of the corresponding E-linear allylic arene, although the catalyst loading could be reduced to only 0.5 mol % when the reaction was carried out at 40 °C (run 6). Nanomicelle reactor generation from surfactant PTS is also very important. The corresponding reaction with educt 2c “on water” was very sluggish (run 2).13b,d
Table 2.
Reactions of 1a with Arylboronic Acids (2)a
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| run | ArB(OH)2 | product | yield(%) |
| 1 | ![]() |
![]() |
99 |
| 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
87 |
| 21 (on water) | |||
| 3 | ![]() |
![]() |
99 |
| 4b | ![]() |
![]() |
74 |
| 5b | ![]() |
![]() |
96 |
| 6 | ![]() |
![]() |
70 (40 °C)c |
| 90 (40 °C)d | |||
| 99 (40 °C)e | |||
| 90 (rt) | |||
Conducted at rt for 5 h in 2% PTS/water with 2 mol % PdCl2(DPEphos), Et3N (3 equiv), arylboronic acid (1.5 equiv), and 1a. The linear:branched ratios of the products were >25:1.
Run for 20 h using 6 mol % PdCl2(Dt-BPF) as the catalyst.
Run for 22 h using 0.15 mol % catalyst.
Using 0.5 mol % catalyst.
Using 1 mol % catalyst.
Functionalized allylic fragments in Suzuki–Miyaura couplings have previously been shown to be especially challenging reaction partners. Nonetheless, under our conditions, allylic ethers having various functional groups can be coupled with ortho-substituted arylboronic acids (e.g., 2b; Table 3). Cinnamic ethers bearing electron-withdrawing or -donating groups react uneventfully to afford the corresponding E-linear allylic arenes in excellent yields at room temperature in water in the presence of 2 mol % catalyst (runs 1–4). Representative examples of dibenzylamine-, amino acid-, and malonate ester-substituted allylic ethers underwent efficient cross-couplings to produce highly functionalized allylic arenes in excellent yields (runs 5–8). That bulky allylic ether 1i led to an almost quantitative yield of the desired product is especially noteworthy (run 8). Doubly allylated ether 1j underwent successive couplings in one pot in the presence of 2 equiv of 2b in good overall isolated yield (run 9). While most reactions of functionalized allylic ethers occurred at room temperature in the presence of ~2 mol % catalyst, catalyst loadings down to 1 mol % were effective with gentle heating to 40 °C (run 7). Although conjugated networks such as 1a predominantly gave the linear coupling product, aliphatic ethers (e.g., 1k, 1l) selectively afforded branched products, reflecting the favored rate of reductive elimination from a more hindered Pd(II) intermediate (runs 10 and 11).6
Table 3.
Reactions of o-Tolylboronic Acid (2b) with Functionalized Allylic Phenyl Ethersa
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| run | ether | product | yield(%) |
| 1 | ![]() |
![]() |
82 |
| 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
85b |
| 3 | ![]() |
![]() |
86b |
| 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
90b |
| 5 | ![]() |
![]() |
82c,d |
| 6 | ![]() |
![]() |
90c,d |
| 7 | ![]() |
![]() |
82d |
| 80d,e | |||
| 8 | ![]() |
![]() |
98c,d |
| 9 | ![]() |
![]() |
72c,d |
| 10 | ![]() |
![]() |
99f |
| 11 | ![]() |
![]() |
71d,f |
Conducted at rt for 6 h in 2% PTS/water with 6 mol % PdCl2(DPEphos), Et3N (3 equiv), allylic ether, and 2b (1.5 equiv).
Run for 10 h using 2 mol % catalyst.
Using 8 mol % catalyst.
Using 2 equiv of 2b.
Run at 40 °C using 1 mol % catalyst.
Using 6 mol % PdCl2(Dt-BPF); E:Z of linear minor product was >25:1.
For an allylic substrate containing both acetate and ether moieties (e.g., 4 in Scheme 3), reaction occurs first at the acetate and subsequently at the less reactive ether residue. Xantphos15 was found to be the preferred ligand, leading to an initial chemoselective coupling product 1f. Second-stage allylic alkylation completes a one-pot amination/Suzuki–Miyaura sequence to give the corresponding aminated methallylbenzene derivative 3l in 76% isolated yield (Scheme 3).
Scheme 3.

One-Pot Amination/Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling
Although the mechanism of this reaction is still under investigation, one plausible pathway is shown in Scheme 4. The reaction starts with oxidative addition of palladium(0) to allylic ether 1 to produce an allylpalladium intermediate (5, 5′, or 5″) with the bidentate ligand. After generation of a σ-allylpalladium species (5 or 5′), transmetalation with arylboronic acid 2 takes place to give the σ-allylarylpalladium intermediate (6 or 6′). Linear product 3 or branched product 7 is then produced by reductive elimination from 6′ or 6, respectively.
Scheme 4.

Proposed Mechanism
In conclusion, the first general Suzuki–Miyaura coupling of boronic acids with allylic ethers has been described. Conditions have been developed that are especially mild and do not rely on an organic solvent as the reaction medium. Further applications of transition-metal-catalyzed cross-coupling chemistry using such typically inert allylic ethers as reaction partners are currently under investigation.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Zymes, LLC for financial support and Johnson Matthey for providing the catalysts PdCl2(DPEphos) (Pd-117) and PdCl2(Dt-BPF) (Pd-118) used in this study.
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and characterization of all new compounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org
References
- 1.(a) Fu GC. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41:1555. doi: 10.1021/ar800148f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Martin R, Buchwald SL. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41:1461. doi: 10.1021/ar800036s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Kotha S, Lahiri K, Kashinath D. Tetrahedron. 2002;58:9633. [Google Scholar]; (d) Miyaura N, Suzuki A. Chem Rev. 1995;95:2457. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Allylic acetate: Mino T, Kajiwara K, Shirae Y, Sakamoto M, Fujita T. Synlett. 2008:2711.. Poláčková V, Toma Š, Kappe CO. Tetrahedron. 2007;63:8742.. Kabalka GW, Al-Masum M. Org Lett. 2006;8:11. doi: 10.1021/ol051955v.. Nájera C, Gil-Moltó J, Karlström S. Adv Synth Catal. 2004;346:1798.. Bouyssi D, Gerusz V, Balme G. Eur J Org Chem. 2002:2445.. Chung K-G, Miyake Y, Uemura S. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans. 2000;1:15.. Uozumi Y, Danjo H, Hayashi T. J Org Chem. 1999;64:3384. doi: 10.1021/jo982438b.. Kobayashi Y, Mizojiri R, Ikeda E. J Org Chem. 1996;61:5391.. Legros J-Y, Fiaud J-C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990;31:7453.. Miyaura N, Yamada K, Suginome H, Suzuki A. J Am Chem Soc. 1985;107:972.
- 3.Allylic halide: Alacid E, Nájera C. J Organomet Chem. 2009;694:1658.. Kabalka GW, Dadush E, Al-Masum M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:7459.. Botella L, Nájera C. J Organomet Chem. 2002;663:46.. Moreno-Manas M, Pajuelo F, Pleixats R. J Org Chem. 1995;60:2396.. Allylic alcohol: Tsukamoto H, Uchiyama T, Suzuki T, Kondo Y. Chem Commun. 2008:3005.. Liang H, Ito S, Yoshifuji M. Org Lett. 2004;6:425. doi: 10.1021/ol036330g.. Kayaki Y, Koda T, Ikariya T. Eur J Org Chem. 2004:4989.. Kabalka GW, Dong G, Venkataiah B. Org Lett. 2003;5:893. doi: 10.1021/ol034067d.. Allylic carbonates: Chen H, Deng M-Z. J Organomet Chem. 2000;603:189.
- 4.(a) Garcí-Iglesias M, Buñuel E, Cárdenas DJ. Organometallics. 2006;25:3611. [Google Scholar]; (b) Solin N, Wallner OA, Szabó KJ. Org Lett. 2005;7:689. doi: 10.1021/ol0475010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Solin N, Kjellgren J, Szabó KJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:7026. doi: 10.1021/ja049357j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hegedus LS. In: Organometallics in Synthesis: A Manual. 2. Schlosser M, Hegedus LS, Lipshutz BH, Marshall JA, Nakamura E, Negishi E, Reetz MT, Semmelhack MF, Smith K, Yamamoto H, editors. Wiley; Chichester, U.K.: 2004. p. 1185. [Google Scholar]
- 6.(a) Yamamoto Y, Takada S, Miyaura N, Iyama T, Tachikawa H. Organometallics. 2009;28:152. [Google Scholar]; (b) Yamamoto Y, Takada S, Miyaura N. Chem Lett. 2006;35:1368. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ohmiya H, Makida Y, Tanaka T, Sawamura M. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:17276. doi: 10.1021/ja808673n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.(a) Zaitsev AB, Gruber S, Pluss PA, Pregosin PS, Veiros LF, Worle M. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:1604. doi: 10.1021/ja804379k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Muzart J. Eur J Org Chem. 2007:3077. [Google Scholar]; (c) Muzart J. Tetrahedron. 2005;61:4179. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Recent reviews: Herrerías CI, Yao X, Li Z, Li C-J. Chem Rev. 2007;107:2546. doi: 10.1021/cr050980b.. Bergman RG. Nature. 2007;446:391. doi: 10.1038/446391a.. Godula K, Sames D. Science. 2006;312:67. doi: 10.1126/science.1114731.. Ishiyama T, Miyaura N. Pure Appl Chem. 2006;78:1369.. Recent allylic C–H aminations: Reed SA, White MC. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:3316. doi: 10.1021/ja710206u.. Liu G, Yin G, Wu L. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:4733. doi: 10.1002/anie.200801009.
- 10.One reaction: Manabe K, Nakada K, Aoyama N, Kobayashi S. Adv Synth Catal. 2005;347:1499.
- 11.Other reactions with allylic ethers: Mora G, Piechaczyk O, Le Goff XF, Le Floch P. Organometallics. 2008;27:2565.. Yasui H, Mizutani K, Yorimitsu H, Oshima K. Tetrahedron. 2006;62:1410.. Murakami H, Minami T, Ozawa F. J Org Chem. 2004;69:4482. doi: 10.1021/jo049732q.. Terao J, Watabe H, Watanabe H, Kambe N. Adv Synth Catal. 2004;346:1674.. Inoue Y, Taguchi M, Toyofuki M, Hashimoto H. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1984;57:3021.. Onoue H, Moritani I, Murahashi S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1973;14:121.. Takahashi K, Miyake A, Hata G. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1972;45:230.
- 12.(a) Tobisu M, Shimasaki T, Chatani N. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:4866. doi: 10.1002/anie.200801447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kakiuchi F, Usui M, Ueno S, Chatani N, Murai S. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:2706. doi: 10.1021/ja0393170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.(a) Lipshutz BH, Abela AR. Org Lett. 2008;10:5329. doi: 10.1021/ol801712e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lipshutz BH, Ghorai S. Aldrichimica Acta. 2008;41:58. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Lipshutz BH, Taft BR. Org Lett. 2008;10:1329. doi: 10.1021/ol702755g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) PTS (polyoxyethanyl-α-tocopheryl sebacate) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (cat. no. 698717) [Google Scholar]
- 14.Switching to cinnamic methyl ether, however, gave less than 40% yield of the corresponding coupling product under identical conditions after 48 h.
- 15.Xantphos is 4,5-bis(diphenylphosphino)-9,9-dimethylxanthene.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



































