Table 2.
Panel A. OLS and 2SLS regression effects on development rate mean
| |||
---|---|---|---|
OLS | 3.65*** (0.6) | ||
|
|||
Area instrument | Area instrument with SES interaction | Caregiver availability instruments | |
|
|||
2SLS | 11.89*** (3.63) | 11.84*** (3.55) | 9.10** (4.21) [1.64, 21.18] |
F statistic | 230.0*** | 111.87*** | 7.31*** |
Over-identification chi-square (1) [p value] | - | 0.068 [p=0.79] | 0.34 [p=0.56] |
Exogenous investment F (1,31) | 5.33** | 5.43** | 1.68 |
Panel B. QR and IVQR effects on development rate quantiles
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quantile | Area instrument | Area instrument with SES interaction | Caregiver availability instruments | |
| ||||
QR | IVQR | QR | IVQR | |
|
||||
0.1 | 4.90*** (0.80) | 14.23*** (1.99) | 14.04*** (1.91) | 14.1** (5.65) [−5.93,33.66] |
0.25 | 4.06*** (0.58) | 13.47*** (1.87) | 13.59*** (1.83) | 13.08*** (3.26) [5.62,23.36] |
0.5 | 3.10*** (0.36) | 11.69*** (1.94) | 11.07*** (1.91) | 6.94* (4.07) [−2.06,42.94] |
0.75 | 2.36*** (0.39) | 7.19*** (2.23) | 7.3*** (2.12) | 7.01* (4.01) [−4.36,27.93] |
0.9 | 2.08*** (0.61) | 4.54** (2.28) | 4.39* (2.26) | 9.2 (5.87) [−6.49,55.23] |
Panel C. Marginal effects on development risk status
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Probit | −0.072*** (0.018) | |||
|
||||
Area instrument | Area instrument with SES interaction | Caregiver availability instruments | ||
|
||||
IV Probit | −0.28*** (0.051) | −0.28*** (0.049) | −0.277*** (0.109) | |
Exogenous investment chi-square (1) | 19.19*** | 21.12*** | 3.03* | |
Over-identification chi-square (1) [p value] | 0.000 [0.991] | 1.52 [0.22] |
indicate p <0.1, <0.05 and <0.01, respectively.
Standard errors are in parentheses. 95% confidence bounds for 2SLS and IVQR that are robust for weak instruments are included in brackets. Area instrument includes average investment at the child’s community level, calculated for each child, excluding the child’s own investment level. Area instrument with socioeconomic status (SES) interaction includes the average investment at the child’s community level (same as area instrument), as well as an interaction term with the SES index. Note that socioeconomic status index is included as a covariate in the model (both in the investment and child development functions).
Derived from the Bayley Infant Neurodevelopment Screener. Copyright @ 2004. Harcourt Assessment Inc. Used with Permission. All rights Reserved.