Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun;26(6):2414–2423. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-201699

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Frequency distributions of in vivo (A; n=31) and in vitro (B; n=32) circadian periods (τ). Numbers of observations (individuals) were assessed for 8 period bins of 0.2 h each (e.g., 23.7<τ≤23.9, 23.9<τ≤24.1).