Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hear Res. 2011 Jan 27;277(1-2):152–162. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.01.013

Figure 4. Ratings of target stimuli in experiment 2.

Figure 4

Same layout as Figure 3, except that the no-adaptor condition is omitted, and both the loud adaptor condition and the soft adaptor condition are split according to their presentation mode. The latter term indicates whether the adaptors and the target within a trial were presented to the same ear or to opposite ears. The dichotic results from experiment 2 were overall similar to the diotic results from experiment 1 (Figure 3). The sensory aftereffect of the adaptors did not depend significantly on whether the adaptors and target were presented to the same ear or to opposite ears (A), suggesting that this aftereffect ‘transferred’ across the two ears. The presentation mode affected the decisional aftereffect of the adaptors (B), indicating a stronger impact on listeners’ decision criterion for adaptors that were presented to the opposite ear than the target.