TABLE I.
Summary of the literature regarding droplet dispensing in DMF devices.
Number of dispensed droplets | Volume variation | Off-chip pressure source? | Feedback control? | Oil? | Dielectric layer | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDP | <3% | No | No | Yes | Parylene | No experimental details provided15 |
42 | 13% | No | No | Yes | Parylene | Devices were construced using multi-layer PCB and the reservoir was surrounded by a retaining wall and had two electrode areas, to increase the backpressure on the droplet when dispensing. In addition, an external pump with a three-way valve was used to dispense droplets. The volume variation of the dispensed droplets was only under 10% when also using feedback control16 |
79 | 12% | Yes | No | |||
42 | 5-6% | Yes | Yes | |||
48 | 0.4% | No | No | Yes | Si3N4 | The reservoir was walled-in and had an extra electrode within; increasing the pressure from the reservoir when dispensing17 |
NDP | 0.2–4% | Yes | No | Yes | Si3N4 | The reservoir was walled-in and had an extra electrode within, increasing the pressure from the reservoir when dispensing18 |
12 | 1 or 5% | No | See comments | Yes | Parylene | Multilayer PCB electrondes were used to avoid problems with the deformation of droplets due to contact lines on the same plane of the device. Volume variation was 1% with feedback control and 5% without; however only 12 droplets were measured in each case, as this was the maximum that could be dispensed from a reservoir without re-filling13 |
NDP | ∼1–3% | No | No | No | Parylene | Volume variation is cited as an estimate and no experimental details were provided3 |