Table.
How the subjects in a phase I gene transfer study for Parkinson’s disease talk about their motivations, understanding, and other influences on their decision to participate.
Subject | Motivation for Participation |
Understanding of Purpose of Study |
Perception of Benefit and Other Influences on Decision to Participate |
Relationship Between Motivation and Understanding of Purpose |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Dual motivation | To test safety | - Trust in neurosurgeon - Denies researchers made specific statements indicating participants would benefit - Intuitive feeling - Hope and optimism |
Dual motivation allows reconciliation: Understood purpose (safety) but still hoped for benefit. |
2 | Benefit to self | To test safety | - Previous subjects doing OK - Hope and optimism - Denies researchers made specific statements indicating participants would benefit |
Chance worth taking: “It’s like throwing the Hail Mary pass…” |
3 | Benefit to self | To test safety To test efficacy (For future PD patients) |
- Previous subjects doing OK - Positive media portrayal - Hope and optimism |
Chance worth taking: “I mean I was willing, you know, to try it anyway.” |
4 | Benefit to self | To test safety To test efficacy (For future PD patients) |
- Denies researchers made specific statements indicating participants would benefit - Allure of gene transfer technology - Intuitive feeling - Hope and optimism - Trust in research team |
Chance worth taking: “There wasn’t much to lose.” |
5 | Benefit to self | To test efficacy (For future PD patients). |
- Previous subjects doing OK - Positive tone of informed consent discussion - Denies researchers made specific statements indicating participants would benefit - Science behind the trial: “the results in the lab with monkeys”; “the preparation that they had gone through” |
Chance worth taking. |
6 | Altruism | To test safety | - Science behind the trial: “the theory behind the procedure.” - Denies researchers made specific statements indicating participants would benefit - Trust in neurosurgeon - Hope and optimism |
Motivation is congruent with the objective purpose of the study. |
7 | Benefit to self | Failed to appreciate the purpose. |
- Influence of previously enrolled subject in GAD study - Trust in neurosurgeon - Positive tone of informed consent discussion - Denies researchers made specific statements indicating participants would benefit - Previous subjects doing OK - Hope and optimism - Positive media portrayal of gene therapy |
Did not care to understand the purpose at the beginning: “…I really don’t remember thinking about what they were trying to accomplish as much as how it was going to affect me.” |
8 | Dual motivation | To test safety To test efficacy (For future PD patients.) |
- Trust in neurosurgeon - Denies researchers made specific statements indicating participants would benefit - Scientific reasons: S8 was later in the study so got “more of the gene” - Hope and optimism - Previous subjects doing OK |
Dual motivation allows reconciliation between motivation and understanding of purpose: “If it benefits me, that’s a bonus.” |