Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 26.
Published in final edited form as: IRB. 2009 Sep-Oct;31(5):7–14.

Table.

How the subjects in a phase I gene transfer study for Parkinson’s disease talk about their motivations, understanding, and other influences on their decision to participate.

Subject Motivation for
Participation
Understanding of
Purpose of Study
Perception of Benefit and Other
Influences on Decision to Participate
Relationship Between Motivation and Understanding
of Purpose
1 Dual motivation To test safety - Trust in neurosurgeon
- Denies researchers made specific
   statements indicating participants would
   benefit
- Intuitive feeling
- Hope and optimism
Dual motivation allows reconciliation: Understood
purpose (safety) but still hoped for benefit.
2 Benefit to self To test safety - Previous subjects doing OK
- Hope and optimism
- Denies researchers made specific
   statements indicating participants would
   benefit
Chance worth taking: “It’s like throwing the Hail Mary
pass…”
3 Benefit to self To test safety
To test efficacy
(For future PD
patients)
- Previous subjects doing OK
- Positive media portrayal
- Hope and optimism
Chance worth taking: “I mean I was willing, you know,
to try it anyway.”
4 Benefit to self To test safety
To test efficacy
(For future PD
patients)
- Denies researchers made specific
   statements indicating participants
   would benefit
- Allure of gene transfer technology
- Intuitive feeling
- Hope and optimism
- Trust in research team
Chance worth taking: “There wasn’t much to lose.”
5 Benefit to self To test efficacy
(For future PD
patients).
- Previous subjects doing OK
- Positive tone of informed consent
   discussion
- Denies researchers made specific
   statements indicating participants would
   benefit
- Science behind the trial: “the results in the
   lab with monkeys”; “the preparation that
   they had gone through”
Chance worth taking.
6 Altruism To test safety - Science behind the trial: “the theory
   behind the procedure.”
- Denies researchers made specific
   statements indicating participants would
   benefit
- Trust in neurosurgeon
- Hope and optimism
Motivation is congruent with the objective purpose of the
study.
7 Benefit to self Failed to appreciate
the purpose.
- Influence of previously enrolled subject in
   GAD study
- Trust in neurosurgeon
- Positive tone of informed consent
   discussion
- Denies researchers made specific
   statements indicating participants would
   benefit
- Previous subjects doing OK
- Hope and optimism
- Positive media portrayal of gene therapy
Did not care to understand the purpose at the beginning:
“…I really don’t remember thinking about what they
were trying to accomplish as much as how it was going
to affect me.”
8 Dual motivation To test safety
To test efficacy
(For future PD
patients.)
- Trust in neurosurgeon
- Denies researchers made specific
   statements indicating participants would
   benefit
- Scientific reasons: S8 was later in the study
   so got “more of the gene”
- Hope and optimism
- Previous subjects doing OK
Dual motivation allows reconciliation between
motivation and understanding of purpose: “If it benefits
me, that’s a bonus.”