Skip to main content
. 2012 May 28;2:51. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2012.00051

Table A1.

Comparison of VHL genotype calls – Cleveland Clinic and Transgenomic (n = 16 samples).

Patient ID Sample ID DNA sequenced at Cleveland Clinic DNA sequenced and reported by Transgenomic
6Pa 407insATATATAT, ex2 412inATATATAT, ex2
6Mb 18 wt wt
6M 19 wtc 412insATATATAT, ex2
6M 20 407insATATATAT, ex2 412insATATATAT, ex2
7P wtd G463C
7M G463C G463C
9P 232delA 232 delA
9M 232delAe P25S, 10% RSIf
10P 24 wt wt
10P 25 C333G C333G
10P 26 C333G C333G
10P 27 C333G C333G
10M C333G C333G
12P wt wt
12M 37 wt wt
12M 38 wt wt

aPrimary.

bMetastatic.

c,d,eCalls based on sequence traces presented in Figure A1.

fRelative signal intensity (RSI).