Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 28.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Nutr. 2011 Jan;105(1):123–132. doi: 10.1017/S0007114510003053

Table 6.

Multivariate hazard ratios for nutritional indices and intakes for cancer mortality*

(Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals)

Hazard ratios (per SD) 95%CI P Hazard ratios (per SD) 95%CI P
Model (a): died n 140, alive n 337
Model (b): died n 92, alive n 243
Plasma Se (μmol/l) 0·72 0·58, 0·89 0·002 0·79 0·63, 0·99 0·04
Plasma Zn (μmol/l) 0·69 0·55, 0·86 0·001 0·70 0·56, 0·88 0·002
Dietary vitamin E (mg/d) 0·13 0·04, 0·42 0·001 0·23 0·06, 0·84 0·026
Model (c): died n 90, alive n 242 Model (d): died n 87, alive n 227
Plasma Se (μmol/l) 0·76 0·60, 0·96 0·024 0·78 0·60, 1·01 0·06
Plasma Zn (μmol/l) 0·74 0·58, 0·95 0·019 0·74 0·57, 0·96 0·03
Dietary vitamin E (mg/d) 0·16 0·04, 0·65 0·011 0·19 0·04, 0·81 0·025
*

If haem Fe is added to these models of cancer mortality, it is a significant predictor, higher values being associated with greater cancer mortality, as follows: Model 1, 1·18 (1·03, 1·35) (0·014); Model 2, 1·15 (0·99, 1·34) (0·06); Model 3: 1·27 (1·08, 1·49) (0·003); Model 4: 1·26 (1·06, 1·50) (0·008). Please see the legend to Table 4 for an explanation of the four models, which follow on from the data, for primary cancer mortality, in the left-hand data column in Table 3.