Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1978 Sep;75(9):4451–4454. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.9.4451

Amplification of DNA sequences during chicken cartilage and neural retina differentiation.

C M Strom, M Moscona, A Dorfman
PMCID: PMC336133  PMID: 279928

Abstract

[3H]BrdUrd-substituted DNA probes were prepared from organ cultures of differentiating chicken neural retina and cell cultures of stage 24 chicken limb buds. Reassociation reactions using the neural retina probe demonstrated amplification of DNA sequences during differentiation of neural retina. This probe also contained sequences present in greater numbers in heart DNA than in DNA from undifferentiated neural retina. Reassociation reactions of both differentiated cartilage and differentiated neural retina DNA with both the neural retina probe and the cartilage probe demonstrated that at least part of the amplified sequences are tissue specific.

Full text

PDF
4451

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alt F. W., Kellems R. E., Bertino J. R., Schimke R. T. Selective multiplication of dihydrofolate reductase genes in methotrexate-resistant variants of cultured murine cells. J Biol Chem. 1978 Mar 10;253(5):1357–1370. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Britten R. J., Davidson E. H. Gene regulation for higher cells: a theory. Science. 1969 Jul 25;165(3891):349–357. doi: 10.1126/science.165.3891.349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Davidson E. H., Hough B. R., Klein W. H., Britten R. J. Structural genes adjacent to interspersed repetitive DNA sequences. Cell. 1975 Mar;4(3):217–238. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(75)90170-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hozumi N., Tonegawa S. Evidence for somatic rearrangement of immunoglobulin genes coding for variable and constant regions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Oct;73(10):3628–3632. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.10.3628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Levitt D., Dorfman A. Control of chondrogenesis in limb-bud cell cultures by bromodeoxyuridine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Aug;70(8):2201–2205. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.8.2201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Levitt D., Dorfman A. The irreversible inhibition of differentiation of limb-bud mesenchyme by bromodeoxyuridine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 May;69(5):1253–1257. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.5.1253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Paul J. General theory of chromosome structure and gene activation in eukaryotes. Nature. 1972 Aug 25;238(5365):444–446. doi: 10.1038/238444a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Perlman S., Phillips C., Bishop J. O. A study of foldback DNA. Cell. 1976 May;8(1):33–42. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90182-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Strom C. M., Dorfman A. Amplification of moderately repetitive DNA sequences during chick cartilage differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Oct;73(10):3428–3432. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.10.3428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Strom C. M., Dorfman A. Distribution of 5-bromodeoxyuridine and thymidine in the DNA of developing chick cartilage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Apr;73(4):1019–1023. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.4.1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. WAKE R. G., BALDWIN R. L. Physical studies on the replication of DNA in vitro. J Mol Biol. 1962 Aug;5:201–216. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(62)80084-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES