Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Bone Miner Res. 2012 May;27(5):1167–1176. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1559

Table 4.

The association between potential mediators and hip fracture adjusted for the base analysis and number of high inflammatory markers

Risk Ratios 95% CIs
Frailty (N pairs=358) 1.36 0.86–2.16
RAND 36 Physical Functioning >90 (N pairs = 344) 0.65 0.43–1.01
Total number of falls at follow-up (N pairs = 333) 0.97 0.92–1.02
Bioavailable estradiol, pg/ml (N pairs=348) 0.96 0.92–1.00
Bioavailable testosterone, pg/ml (N pairs=355) 0.97 0.94–0.99
SHBG, μg/dl (N pairs=356) 1.41 1.13–1.75
Cystatin-C, ng/ml (N pairs=353) 1.49 0.63–3.54
PINP, ng/ml (N pairs=345) 1.00 0.99–1.01
CTx, ng/ml (N pairs=348) 1.48 0.63–3.50
25(OH)D, ng/ml (N pairs=357) 0.97 0.95–1.00

N indicates number of case-control pairs included in the analysis.

Base analysis was matched on age, ethnicity, blood draw date, controlled for BMI, self-reported health, physical activity, parental history of hip fracture, history of fracture, smoking, alcohol use, NSAID use, treated diabetes, RA, corticosteroid use, and total calcium and vitamin D intake.

Number of inflammatory markers in the top quartile according to the distribution of cytokine soluble receptor concentrations among the controls.