Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 29.
Published in final edited form as: Metabolism. 2010 Jan 8;59(8):1092–1105. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2009.11.006

Table 3.

Body weights, tissue weights, caloric intake and surrogate markers for insulin resistance in mice that had been fed an ad libitum high fat diet for 9 weeks, and after 1 week recovery from phlebotomy had been switched to the intervention diets for another 9 weeks.

RLF (n=5) RHF-P (n=5) RHF (n=5)
19 weeks 19 weeks 19 weeks

Body weight gain (g) −6.8 ± 0.9 ** 0.3 ± 1.1 11.3 ± 0.8 ***
Liver weight (g) 0.98 ± 0.06 *** 1.63 ± 0.07 3.52 ± 0.40 **
Liver/body weight ratio 0.034 ± 0.00 *** 0.044 ± 0.00 0.072 ± 0.01 **
Total caloric intake / mouse (kcal) 468 492 754
Caloric efficiency (g/kcal) −0.0145 0.0006 0.0150
Relative Inguinal fat mass (%) 3.73 ± 0.72 ** 7.37 ± 0.58 9.36 ± 0.48 *
Mesenteric fat pad (%) 1.91 ± 0.29 ** 3.50 ± 0.23 4.38 ± 0.14 *
Retroperitoneal fat pad (%) 1.67 ± 0.35 * 2.74 ± 0.26 4.32 ± 0.24 **
Epidydimal fat pad (%) 4.56 ± 0.61 *** 8.44 ± 0.45 12.28 ± 0.70 **
White adipose tissue fat index (%) 11.87 ± 1.92 ** 22.05 ± 1.40 29.33 ± 1.36 **
Fasting glucose (mg/dL) 204 ± 8 250 ± 15 252 ± 11
Fasting insulin (μU/mL) 16.9 ± 2.2 ** 72.6 ± 7.1 90.4 ± 13.8
QUICKI 0.28 ± 0.01 *** 0.24 ± 0.00 0.23 ± 0.00
HOMA 8.6 ± 1.3 ** 44.5 ± 5.6 57.2 ± 11.2
Log(HOMA) 0.91 ± 0.07 *** 1.63 ± 0.06 1.72 ± 0.09

Values given are means ± SEM; RHF-P group was used as reference;

*

P<0.05;

**

P<0.01;

***

P<0.001.

RLF indicates reversal low fat; RHF-P, reversal high fat pair-fed; RHF, reversal high fat; QUICKI, quantitative insulin-sensitivity check index; HOMA, homeostasis model assessment.