Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 7;302(9):C1293–C1305. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00397.2011

Table 4.

Rates of MTS inhibition

Residue Reagent κ, M−1·s−1 (MTSEA Equivalent)
N78C MTSEA (3 μM) 1,000
H83C MTSEA (1 μM) 4,000
L87C MTSEA (2 μM) 10,000
F101C MTSET (40 μM) 500
Y290C MTSET (25 μM) 800
S392C MeMTS* na
S393C MeMTS* na
F453C MTSET (2 μM) 2,000
Q457C MTSEA (0.3 μM) 14,000

Labeling conditions and estimated methanethiosulfonate (MTS) reaction rates: for each reagent we determined the concentration that inhibited hSGLT1 Na+/glucose currents by 50% in 2 min in 100 mM NaCl buffer. Because 2-aminoethyl methanethiosulfonate (MTSEA) is inherently more reactive than 2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl methanethiosulfonate (MTSET), we normalized the MTSET reaction rate to that of MTSEA, e.g., the concentration for ∼50% inhibition of H83C was determined for MTSEA (1 μM) and MTSET (5 μM) in Na buffer for 2 min: κ = 0.5/([MTS]·t). Since the rate was 5-fold higher for MTSEA than MTSET, the rates for MTSET were multiplied by 5 to normalize the results.

*

Neither MTSEA nor MTSET inhibited S392C or S393C, but 100 μM methyl methanethiosulfonate (MeMTS) inhibited 50%. Low functional expression of E102C, and L452C precluded estimation of rates, and neither MTSEA nor MTSES inhibited W291C. Note that tetramethylrhodamine-6-maleimide(TMR6M) partially inhibited E102C and L452C and TMR5M partially inhibited W291C and L452C.