Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 11.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomech. 2012 Apr 6;45(8):1529–1533. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.03.013

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Mean systematic error and random error (± SD) for paw-contact and paw-off times across all slope conditions, recovery times and cats determined by comparing the kinematic methods with the GRF method. n=963. Significant differences between all pairs of systematic error for paw-contact and paw-off (p<0.05) were found.