Skip to main content
. 2012 May 1;2(5):607–617. doi: 10.1534/g3.112.002600

Table 3. Description of parental-specific and integrated maps.

LG ‘273-7’-specific Map ‘T17-349’-specific Map
Number of Loci Length (cM) Densitya (cM per marker) Segregation Distortion Ratio (%)b Number of Loci Length (cM) Densitya (cM per marker) Segregation Distortion Ratio (%)b
1a 54 153.0 2.83 50.0 63 153.8 2.44 71.4
1b 83 186.5 2.25 53.0 37 178.5 4.82 59.5
2a 55 122.3 2.22 34.5 62 197.6 3.20 58.1
2b 47 159.0 3.38 66.0 58 179.7 3.10 36.2
3a 82 150.0 1.83 19.5 51 154.5 3.03 37.3
3b 101 147.4 1.46 28.7 63 107.5 1.71 52.4
4a 100 158.3 1.58 26.0 62 129.4 2.09 75.8
4b 70 139.5 1.99 28.6 76 155.5 2.05 40.8
5a 64 138.2 2.16 29.7 64 142.4 2.22 35.9
5b 47 149.6 3.18 34.0 64 175.0 2.73 50.0
6a 24 97.6 4.07 41.7 22 120.5 5.48 54.6
6b 55 140.0 2.54 36.4 16 124.3 7.77 50.0
7a 38 129.3 3.40 57.9 56 252.3 4.51 44.6
7b 72 174.5 2.42 27.8 44 115.4 2.62 72.7
8a 89 126.8 1.43 31.5 85 174.5 2.05 60.0
8b 78 150.7 1.93 39.7 40 89.6 2.24 57.5
Total 1059 2322.9 2.19 35.7 863 2450.3 2.84 53.3
LG Integrated Map
Number of Loci Length (cM) Densitya (cM per marker) Segregation Distortion Ratio (%)b
1a 106 159.1 1.50 57.6
1b 113 190.9 1.69 62.0
2a 107 122.9 1.15 45.8
2b 98 207.8 2.12 50.0
3a 124 172.5 1.39 28.2
3b 146 142.6 0.98 41.8
4a 141 157.0 1.11 51.8
4b 134 177.1 1.32 35.8
5a 118 164.5 1.39 35.6
5b 108 156.2 1.45 39.8
6a (44)c (109.08)c (2.48)c (50.0)c
6b 63 132.4 2.10 39.7
7a 86 155.7 1.81 53.5
7b 101 151.5 1.50 46.5
8a 146 166.1 1.14 52.1
8b 108 146.0 1.35 44.4
Total 1743 2511.3 1.44 45.6
a

Average length between two loci.

b

A significant level at P < 0.05.

c

LG 6a was not integrated because of fewer bi-parental markers. Therefore, the number of locus and length were investigated as follows: number of locus = (total number of the parental-specific maps) – (number of commonly mapped markers on the parental-specific maps); length = average length of the parental-specific maps.