Table 2.
Comparison of True Genomic Values estimations
| First author | Label | r | rank | bias | MSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shariati | BayesS_1 | 0.86 | 0.53 | 0.89 | 7.51 |
| BayesS_2 | 0.86 | 0.53 | 0.89 | 7.52 | |
| BayesS_3 | 0.86 | 0.53 | 0.88 | 7.85 | |
| BayesS_4 | 0.85 | 0.55 | 0.87 | 8.00 | |
| Ogutu | RR | 0.85 | 0.54 | 1.19 | 8.44 |
| GBLUP_O | 0.90 | 0.52 | 1.11 | 5.55 | |
| LASSO_O | 0.92 | 0.63 | 1.09 | 4.67 | |
| LASSO_ad | 0.92 | 0.62 | 1.02 | 4.30 | |
| EN | 0.92 | 0.62 | 1.23 | 4.96 | |
| EN_ad | 0.90 | 0.40 | 0.97 | 5.48 | |
| Wang | BayesA_W | 0.92 | 0.65 | 1.06 | 4.15 |
| BayesB_W | 0.93 | 0.70 | 1.05 | 3.66 | |
| BayesCπ_W | 0.93 | 0.70 | 1.06 | 3.63 | |
| TABLUP | 0.91 | 0.68 | 0.97 | 4.59 | |
| GBLUP_W | 0.78 | 0.37 | 1.20 | 11.71 | |
| Mucha | AM | 0.61 | 0.36 | 1.06 | 17.57 |
| FM | 0.49 | 0.32 | 0.35 | 43.17 | |
| RM1 | 0.70 | 0.38 | 1.77 | 16.65 | |
| RM2 | 0.71 | 0.38 | 1.69 | 16.30 | |
| Zeng | GBLUPa_Z | 0.82 | 0.53 | 1.04 | 8.94 |
| GBLUPd_Z | 0.81 | 0.52 | 1.04 | 9.46 | |
| BayesB _W | 0.93 | 0.71 | 1.05 | 3.63 | |
| BayesCπ_W | 0.94 | 0.72 | 1.07 | 3.41 | |
| Usai | LASSO_Uc | 0.92 | 0.62 | 1.25 | 5.04 |
| LASSO_Uc1 | 0.90 | 0.64 | 1.02 | 5.30 | |
| LASSO_Uc2 | 0.92 | 0.63 | 1.09 | 4.66 | |
| Schurink | BayesZ | 0.90 | 0.60 | 1.06 | 5.20 |
r=Pearson correlation between TGV and GEBV, rank=rank correlation of the best 10% TGV, bias = regression coefficient between TGV and GEBV, MSEP= mean squared error of prediction of TGV by GEBV.