Skip to main content
. 2012 May 21;6(Suppl 2):S3. doi: 10.1186/1753-6561-6-S2-S3

Table 3.

Comparison of True Breeding Values estimations

First author Label r rank bias MSE

Shariati BayesS_1 0.84 0.48 0.33 12.92

BayesS_2 0.84 0.47 0.33 12.94

BayesS_3 0.83 0.49 0.33 13.37

BayesS_4 0.82 0.49 0.32 13.62
Ogutu RR 0.83 0.52 0.45 5.55

GBLUP_O 0.81 0.51 0.39 8.23

LASSO_O 0.87 0.55 0.43 6.44

LASSO_ad 0.88 0.60 0.37 9.94

EN 0.87 0.52 0.44 5.86

EN_ad 0.81 0.48 0.33 12.01

Wang BayesA_W 0.86 0.61 0.38 9.07

BayesB_W 0.89 0.66 0.38 9.12

BayesCπ_W 0.88 0.65 0.39 9.00

TABLUP 0.88 0.64 0.36 10.88

GBLUP_W 0.77 0.48 0.46 4.98

Mucha AM 0.59 0.37 0.40 5.93

FM 0.47 0.44 0.13 43.01

RM1 0.70 0.34 0.68 2.54

RM2 0.70 0.34 0.65 2.68

Zeng GBLUPa_Z 0.82 0.50 0.40 7.61

GBLUPd_Z 0.81 0.49 0.40 7.59

BayesB _W 0.89 0.66 0.38 9.22

BayesCπ_W 0.89 0.66 0.39 8.84

Usai LASSO_Uc 0.86 0.53 0.45 5.66

LASSO_Uc1 0.86 0.62 0.37 9.54

LASSO_Uc2 0.87 0.55 0.43 6.48

Schurink BayesZ 0.87 0.63 0.39 5.20

(r=Pearson correlation between TBV and GEBV, rank=rank correlation of the best 10% TBV, bias = regression coefficient between TBV and GEBV, MSE= mean squared error of prediction of TBV by GEBV)