Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 30.
Published in final edited form as: Fla Entomol. 2005 Jan 1;88(4):372–382. doi: 10.1653/0015-4040(2005)88[372:EOEACO]2.0.CO;2

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Mean (± SE) estimated finite rate of population increase (λ′). Different letters indicate significant differences among Ae. albopictus density treatments (F = 90.08, df = 4, 40, P < 0.0001), but litter type and the litter type × density treatment interaction were not significant (all F < 3.75, P > 0.05).