Table 2.
The recognition rates of the compared methods.
| Euclidean-distance-based method | Metric-learning-based method | |
|---|---|---|
| 480 training, 960 testing | 78.96% | 86.46% |
| 720 training, 720 testing | 82.08% | 91.25% |
| 960 training, 480 testing | 86.25% | 92.29% |
| 1200 training, 240 testing | 84.58% | 93.75% |