TABLE I.
Study | Grading System | Magnet Strength (T) | MRI and Arthroscopy Blinding | Temporal* | Compartments Analyzed | Diagnostic Performance | Comments |
Hughes et al.12(Level II) | Modifications of Pritsch et al.18, Dipaola et al.11, Kramer et al.19, and Bohndorf23 | 1.0 | Radiologist blinded to clinical information, radiographs, and arthroscopy; surgeon aware of MRI initial results. | 2 mo to 2 yr; majority within 6 mo | Medial femoral condyle (12 knees), lateral femoral condyle (7 knees), lateral tibial plateau (1 knee), and patella (1 knee) | 100% correlation for stability of the lesion; 55% (6/11) were not correctly graded by MRI; 72% were correctly graded, with MRI performed within 4 mo of arthroscopy. | Retrospective cohort of 19 patients (5-15 years old) with 21 knees evaluated by both MRI and arthroscopy; not stated if patients were consecutive. |
Hung and Huang15(Level III) | Not established | 1.5 | Not reported | Not reported | Medial and lateral femoral condyles | Sensitivity and specificity not reported; 100% accuracy could be calculated for identifying unstable lesion. | Retrospective (not stated if consecutive) study of 11 patients with OCD (7 in knee), only 5 had comparison with arthroscopy; established diagnostic criteria of OCD lesions were not described and, thus, study downgraded to Level III. |
Kijowski et al.13(Level II) | De Smet et al.20 | 1.5-3.0 | Radiologists blinded to arthroscopy report. | Within 58 d; mean, 21.7 d | Medial femoral condyle (49), lateral femoral condyle (16), and lateral femoral trochlea (5) | 100% sensitivity if all criteria used to determine stability, specificity of 11% for juvenile OCD and 100% for adult for determining stability; further information about secondary MRI findings | Retrospective, consecutive study of 65 patients who had both MRI and arthroscopy performed on symptomatic knee with suspected OCD lesion; 34 adult OCD lesions and 36 juvenile OCD lesions. |
Kocher et al.16(Level III) | Not reported | 1.5 | Radiologist not blinded to diagnosis. MRI and reports were available to surgeons. | Not reported | Not reported | Sensitivity of 90.9%, specificity of 97.9%, positive predictive value of 69.5%, and negative predictive value of 99.5% for identifying OCD lesion | Retrospective, consecutive study identified 22 knee OCD lesions in patients with intra-articular knee disorders; established diagnostic criteria of OCD lesions were not described and, thus, study downgraded to Level III. |
Luhmann et al.17(Level III) | Not reported | 1.5 | Radiologist not blinded to diagnosis. Surgeon not blinded to radiology report. | Not reported | Not reported | Sensitivity of 77.8%, specificity of 94.9%, positive predictive value of 77.8%, and negative predictive value of 94.9% for identifying OCD lesion | Prospective, consecutive study of adolescent knees, 19 OCD lesions; established diagnostic criteria of OCD lesions were not described; and, thus, study downgraded to Level III. |
O'Connor et al.14(Level II) | Dipaola et al.11 for MRI and Guhl21 for arthroscopy | 0.5 | Radiologist blinded to arthroscopy results. Not stated if surgeon blinded. | 1-58 wk; mean, 18 wk | Not reported | 45% of original MRI reports accurately predicted arthroscopy grade; re-report of MRI with Dipaola system resulted in 85% accurate prediction of arthroscopy grade. | Retrospective study of patients who had MRI and arthroscopy of suspected OCD lesions; 33 knees in 31 patients were identified (age range, 6-15 yr; mean, 11.8 yr). |
Dipaola et al.11(Level II) | Modification of Berndt and Harty22 | 0.35 | Prospective blinded radiographic classification performed by radiologist. | Within 7 wk | Medial femoral condyle | All but 1 of 6 lesions correctly staged. | Prospective, not stated if consecutive (therefore downgraded to Level-II evidence), double-blind study of 14 patients (6 knees examined) |
Temporal refers to the time between MRI and arthroscopy.