Table 2.

Echocardiographic and hemodynamic data in sham and ACF rats.

	Sham	ACF	Sham+Allopurinol	ACF+Allopurinol
LVESD (mm)	3.54±0.3	3.1±0.3	3.1±0.42	3.5±0.2
LVEDD (mm)	6.4±0.2	6.7±0.3*	6.4±0.3	7±0.1*
LVESV (µL)	90±9	92±17	69±14	95±13
LVEDV (µL)	326±17	389±26	308±22	364±18
EF (%)	73±2	77±3	77±4	74±3
LVPWs (mm)	2.8±0.1	3±0.2	3±0.2	2.7±0.1
LVPWd (mm)	1.8±0.1	1.8±0.2	1.8±0.1	1.5±0.03
LVES σ	43±7	23±4*	34±11	32±4*
LVED σ	2.5±0.2	8±1.1*	4±1.5	5±0.6*§
LV ESPVR	1.48±0.2	0.36±0.07*	1.62±0.26	0.71±0.07*§
N	7	8	6	8

LV end-systolic dimension (LVESD), LV end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD), LVES volume (LVESV), LVEDV, LV Ejection Fraction (EF), LVES Posterior wall thickness (LVPWs), LVED Posterior wall thickness (LVPWd) LVES wall stress (σ) LVED σ, LV ES Pressure-Volume

Relationship*= P<0.05 vs Sham,

^§P<0.05 vs ACF, data = mean ± SE