Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 30.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2011 Nov 3;50(47):10231–10240. doi: 10.1021/bi200801z

Table 2.

Summary of Cu EXAFS Fitting Analysis for Methylocystis sp. strain M pMMOa

sample nearest-neighbor ligand environmentb
nearest-neighbor ligand environmentb
Fg
atomc R (Å)d CNe σ2f atomc R (Å)d CNe σ2f atomc R (Å)d CNe σ2f
reduced O/N 2.02 1 0.8 O/N 2.15 3 1.1 C 4.01 0.25 4.1 0.24
Cu 2.64 0.75 4.3
as-isolated O/N 1.97 3 4.6 Cu 2.53 0.25 5.0 C 2.99 0.75 3.4 0.21
C 3.30 1 5.9
C 3.90 2 4.9
Cu-reconstituted O/N 1.97 3 4.3 Cu 2.52 0.25 6.0 C 2.97 0.75 5.5 0.20
C 3.30 1 3.6
C 3.89 2 5.4
oxidized O/N 1.96 3 5.1 Cu 2.53 0.25 3.7 C 2.85 0.75 5.6 0.25
C 3.29 1 5.4
C 3.86 2 5.0
a

Data were fit over a k range of 1–12.85 Å−1.

b

Independent metal–ligand scattering environment.

c

Scattering atoms: O (oxygen), N (nitrogen), and C (carbon), and Cu (copper).

d

Average metal–ligand bond length from three independent samples.

e

Average metal–ligand coordination number from three independent samples.

f

Average Debye–Waller factor in Å2 × 103 from three independent samples.

g

Number of degrees of freedom weighted mean-square deviation between data and fit.