Table 4. Table 4. Pairwise F _ST values among the 13 populations surveyed of Apodemus draco.

	4 (MEK)	5 (ZG)	6 (JM)	7 (JY)	9 (HY)	10 (YX)	13 (JL)	15 (GM)	16 (EM)	17 (QC)	18 (DC)	19 (MX)
5 (ZG)	0.959	–
6 (JM)	0.700	0.907	–
7 (JY)	0.970	0.406	0.907	–
9 (HY)	0.904	0.950	0.379	0.958	–
10 (YX)	0.969	0.059	0.911	0.415	0.960	–
13 (JL)	0.981	0.470	0.918	-0.026	0.972	0.560	–
15 (GM)	0.379	0.426	0.287	0.386	0.312	0.416	0.412	–
16 (EM)	0.919	0.961	0.421	0.970	0.058	0.970	0.980	0.348	–
17 (QC)	0.884	0.907	0.794	0.909	0.872	0.913	0.923	0.429	0.894	–
18 (DC)	0.985	0.954	0.934	0.957	0.978	0.964	0.979	0.666	0.984	0.942	–
19 (MX)	0.958	0.939	0.822	0.952	0.946	0.955	0.979	0.394	0.959	0.310	0.984	–
20 (HS)	0.956	0.941	0.828	0.954	0.945	0.956	0.978	0.409	0.958	0.325	0.983	−0.004

Populations contain only one sample are exclude in this analyses.

Numbers in bold indicate statistically significant genetic differentiation (P<0.05). Populations are numbered as in Table 1.