Skip to main content
. 2012 May 30;7(5):e38184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038184

Table 5. Table 5. Results of hierarchical analyses of molecular variance (AMOVA) conducted using different grouping options.

Groups compared No. groups Source of variation d.f. Percentage variation (%) P value F statistics
All populations 13 Among populations 12 66.52 0.000 F CT = 0.665
Among sites within populations 21 13.87 0.016 F SC = 0.414
Among samples within sites 85 19.61 0.000 F ST = 0.804
Populations in clade 1* # 4 Among populations 3 26.35 0.019 F CT = 0.264
Among sites within populations 14 25.49 0.017 F SC = 0.346
Among samples within sites 45 48.15 0.000 F ST = 0.518
Main clades* 5 Among clades 4 86.37 0.000 F CT = 0.864
Among populations within clades 9 7.06 0.000 F SC = 0.518
Among samples within populations 105 6.58 0.000 F ST = 0.934
Subclades in clade 1* 3 Among subclades 2 70.73 0.016 F CT = 0.707
Among populations s within subclades 3 10.76 0.000 F SC = 0.368
Among samples within populations 47 18.51 0.000 F ST = 0.815
*

Populations contain only one sample are exclude in all the analyses Main evolutionary clades and subclades in clade 1 are observed in our phylogenetic trees.

# Jiajin Moutain, Erlang Moutain, Gongga Mountain, Hongya county.