Table 5. Table 5. Results of hierarchical analyses of molecular variance (AMOVA) conducted using different grouping options.
Groups compared | No. groups | Source of variation | d.f. | Percentage variation (%) | P value | F statistics |
All populations | 13 | Among populations | 12 | 66.52 | 0.000 | F CT = 0.665 |
Among sites within populations | 21 | 13.87 | 0.016 | F SC = 0.414 | ||
Among samples within sites | 85 | 19.61 | 0.000 | F ST = 0.804 | ||
Populations in clade 1* # | 4 | Among populations | 3 | 26.35 | 0.019 | F CT = 0.264 |
Among sites within populations | 14 | 25.49 | 0.017 | F SC = 0.346 | ||
Among samples within sites | 45 | 48.15 | 0.000 | F ST = 0.518 | ||
Main clades* | 5 | Among clades | 4 | 86.37 | 0.000 | F CT = 0.864 |
Among populations within clades | 9 | 7.06 | 0.000 | F SC = 0.518 | ||
Among samples within populations | 105 | 6.58 | 0.000 | F ST = 0.934 | ||
Subclades in clade 1* | 3 | Among subclades | 2 | 70.73 | 0.016 | F CT = 0.707 |
Among populations s within subclades | 3 | 10.76 | 0.000 | F SC = 0.368 | ||
Among samples within populations | 47 | 18.51 | 0.000 | F ST = 0.815 |
Populations contain only one sample are exclude in all the analyses Main evolutionary clades and subclades in clade 1 are observed in our phylogenetic trees.
# Jiajin Moutain, Erlang Moutain, Gongga Mountain, Hongya county.