Skip to main content
. 2012 May 31;27(Suppl 1):33–38. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2030-8

Table 2.

QUADAS-2 Questions for Assessing Risk of Bias in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies*

Domain 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? (Yes/No/Unclear)
Was a case-control design avoided? (Yes/No/Unclear)
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? (Yes/No/Unclear)
Could the selection of patients have introduced bias? Risk: Low/High/Unclear
Domain 2: Index Test(s) (complete for each index test used)
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the reference standard? (Yes/No/Unclear)
If a threshold was used, was it pre-specified? (Yes/No/Unclear)
Could the conduct or interpretation of the index test have introduced bias? Risk: Low/High/Unclear
Domain 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standard likely to correctly classify the target condition? (Yes/No/Unclear)
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index test? (Yes/No/Unclear)
Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced bias? Risk: Low/High/Unclear
Domain 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test(s) and reference standard? (Yes/No/Unclear)
Did all patients receive a reference standard? (Yes/No/Unclear)
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? (Yes/No/Unclear)
Were all patients included in the analysis? (Yes/No/Unclear)
Could the patient flow have introduced bias? Risk: Low/High/Unclear

*Questions related to assessing applicability were excluded here. See the original reference for the complete scale13