Skip to main content
. 2012 May 22;2012:476316. doi: 10.1155/2012/476316

Table 5.

Comparison of SNPs found significant in prior Carlson et al.a study with current, non-overlapping sample.

SNP Seattle SNP annotation Carlson coefficient (±SE) Carlson t-Statistic b Carlson P c Current coefficient (±SE)d Current t-Statistic b Current P c
rs854566e PON16842 −10.6  (±4.3) −2.480 0.014 −20.4  (±4.68) −4.353 1.64 × 10 − 5
rs3917510 PON112471 16.6  (±6.9) 2.424 0.016 14.3  (±6.48) 2.208 0.028
rs2269829 PON119470 −16.5  (±10.8) −1.520 0.129 13.6  (±21.82) 0.625 0.533
rs3917564 PON123887 −39.0  (±18.1) −2.153 0.032 15.0  (±26.67) 0.564 0.573
rs854549 PON129021 9.2  (±4.5) 2.051 0.041 −1.3  (±4.90) −0.260 0.795
rs854572 PON1895 13.0  (±4.9) 2.677 0.008 −0.28  (±4.97) −0.056 0.955

SE = standard error.

aCarlson et al. study n = 500 European male subjects [27].

b t-Statistics and P-values were calculated from the coefficients from each subgroup (Carlson n = 500, current study n = 523) and standard errors within the best-fit multivariate model by the glm function in R.

cBoth Carlson and current study utilized a linear regression model adjusting for age, current smoking status, and the four functional PON1 SNPs.

dCurrent study subset of 523 European male subjects not considered by Carlson et al.

eRepresented by proxy SNP, rs854457, with LD r 2 = 0.93 in the current study.