Skip to main content
. 2012 May 31;7(5):e37820. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037820

Table 1. Correlations of c-fos expression with rIGT performance and individual %LG.

Brain area rIGT-advantageous choices LG%
r =  p =  r =  p = 
Cortical
Medial OFC −.201 .346 −.299 .156
Ventral OFC −.292 .167 −.330 .115
Lateral OFC (females only) −.600 .039* −.554 .062
Cingulate (Cg1) −.369 .076 −.360 .084
Prelimbic (PrL) −.418 .042* −.344 .100
Infralimbic (IL) −.460 .024* −.251 .236
Insular −.456 .025* −.531 .008*
Striatal
Dorsolateral striatum (DLS) −.222 .308 .136 .536
Dorsomedial striatum (DMS) −.332 .141 −.273 .214
Nucleus accumbens core (NaC) −.308 .153 −.269 .214
Nucleus accumbens shell (NaS) −.373 .080 −.464 .026*
Limbic
Amygdala central nucleus (CeN) .148 .500 .222 .309
Basolateral amygdala (BLA) −.075 .735 .366 .086
Dentate gyrus (DG) .151 .493 −.096 .663
CA1 region (CA1) .015 .944 −.251 .236

Correlations between c-fos expression and both rIGT performance and individual %LG (* p<0.05; p<0.1). Male and female data were pooled (n = 24), except for the lateral OFC (n = 12).