Table 1.
Entry | Ligand | Solv. | T (°C) | Yield of 2 (%)b | ee of 2 (%)c |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | L1 | THF | rt | 90 | 50 (S) |
2 | L2 | THF | rt | 78 | 75 (S) |
3 | L2 | THF | −25 | 87 | 86 (S) |
4 | L2 | Et2O | −25 | 83 (98)d | 91 (S) |
5e | L2 | Et2O | −35 | n.d. | n.d. |
6 | L3a | Et2O | −25 | 96 | 89 (R) |
7 | L3b | Et2O | −25 | 95 | 91 (R) |
8 | L3c | Et2O | −25 | 99 | 90 (S) |
9f | BDP | THF | rt | - | - |
Performed on a 0.1 mmol scale in 0.3 mL solvent.
By 1H NMR using Ph3CH as internal standard.
By chiral HPLC. Absolute stereochemistry was determined by comparing optical rotation to that of the known compound.
Isolated yield (0.25 mmol scale).
Low conversion after prolonged reaction time.
1,2-/1,4-ratio = 1:7, 60% isolated yield of 1,4-reduced enone.