Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2010 Jun 16;132(23):7852–7853. doi: 10.1021/ja102689e

Table 1.

Selected optimization conditions for regio- and stereo-controlled 1,2-reductions (see SI for full details)a

graphic file with name nihms-207362-t0006.jpg

Entry Ligand Solv. T (°C) Yield of 2 (%)b ee of 2 (%)c
1 L1 THF rt 90 50 (S)
2 L2 THF rt 78 75 (S)
3 L2 THF −25 87 86 (S)
4 L2 Et2O −25 83 (98)d 91 (S)
5e L2 Et2O −35 n.d. n.d.
6 L3a Et2O −25 96 89 (R)
7 L3b Et2O −25 95 91 (R)
8 L3c Et2O −25 99 90 (S)
9f BDP THF rt - -
a

Performed on a 0.1 mmol scale in 0.3 mL solvent.

b

By 1H NMR using Ph3CH as internal standard.

c

By chiral HPLC. Absolute stereochemistry was determined by comparing optical rotation to that of the known compound.

d

Isolated yield (0.25 mmol scale).

e

Low conversion after prolonged reaction time.

f

1,2-/1,4-ratio = 1:7, 60% isolated yield of 1,4-reduced enone.