Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Dev. 2011 Sep 13;21(2):354–375. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00631.x

Table 3.

Model Fit and Comparisons of Parameters Varying by Gender

Statistic Model 1a Model 1b Model 1c diff a & b diff b & c Model 2c Model 3c
Chi 111.44 33.924 22.303 77.516 11.621 146.034 417.036
df 26 22 18 4 4 106 305
p-value 0.0000 0.0500 0.2188 0.0000 0.0204 0.0061 0.0000
CFI 0.955 0.994 0.998 0.980 0.967
TLI 0.924 0.987 0.994 0.964 0.956
RMSEA 0.077 0.031 0.021 0.026 0.026

Note. Model 1a is a two-group model with growth curve parameters constrained across gender; Model 1b is the same except that growth parameters were allowed to vary by gender; in Model 1c both RAgg growth parameters and PAgg covariates were allowed to vary by gender.