Table 2.
Reaction | Intentional failures | Unintentional failures | r |
---|---|---|---|
Punishment | 4.06 (1.22) | 3.12 (1.07) | .58*** |
Reward | 3.27 (1.16) | 4.26 (1.29) | .58*** |
Work with | 3.37 (1.07) | 4.36 (1.26) | .57*** |
Have on team | 3.25 (1.17) | 4.34 (1.25) | .60*** |
Trustworthy | 3.37 (0.89) | 4.43 (1.11) | .61*** |
Selfish | 4.47 (1.07) | 3.35 (1.03) | .62*** |
Likeable | 3.51 (0.98) | 4.38 (1.00) | .59*** |
Aggressive | 3.84 (1.20) | 3.46 (1.00) | .35** |
Competence | 4.69 (1.05) | 4.79 (1.01) | .10 |
Personality as cause | 4.65 (0.97) | 3.57 (1.04) | .62*** |
Situation as cause | 3.97 (1.15) | 4.82 (0.94) | .48*** |
Intentionality (manipulation check) | 4.85 (0.92) | 3.71 (1.10) | .64*** |
Note. Greater means indicate that a target is perceived as deserving more of a given outcome, being more desirable as a particular type of cooperation partner, or having more of a given trait or that a given cause is more applicable to the target. Response options ranged from 1 to 7. All comparisons had df = 73.
p < .01.
p < .001.