Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Jan 23;102(6):1252–1270. doi: 10.1037/a0027026

Table 2.

Means (Standard Deviations) for Reactions to the Target Types: Study 1

Reaction Intentional failures Unintentional failures r
Punishment 4.06 (1.22) 3.12 (1.07) .58***
Reward 3.27 (1.16) 4.26 (1.29) .58***
Work with 3.37 (1.07) 4.36 (1.26) .57***
Have on team 3.25 (1.17) 4.34 (1.25) .60***
Trustworthy 3.37 (0.89) 4.43 (1.11) .61***
Selfish 4.47 (1.07) 3.35 (1.03) .62***
Likeable 3.51 (0.98) 4.38 (1.00) .59***
Aggressive 3.84 (1.20) 3.46 (1.00) .35**
Competence 4.69 (1.05) 4.79 (1.01) .10
Personality as cause 4.65 (0.97) 3.57 (1.04) .62***
Situation as cause 3.97 (1.15) 4.82 (0.94) .48***
Intentionality (manipulation check) 4.85 (0.92) 3.71 (1.10) .64***

Note. Greater means indicate that a target is perceived as deserving more of a given outcome, being more desirable as a particular type of cooperation partner, or having more of a given trait or that a given cause is more applicable to the target. Response options ranged from 1 to 7. All comparisons had df = 73.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.