Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Jun;89(6):892–900. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318255da73

Table 1.

Demographic, vision and care model parameters of the samples by site

Site (n) Age (yrs)
(Mean ± STD)
SPHEQ
(Mean ± STD)
VA (LogMAR) in
best eye
(Mean ± STD)
Female
(%)
Screening &
referral Care
Model (%)
Income ≥
25000 (%)
Average parent
education ≥ high
school (%)
At least one
myopic
parent (%)
Full Data Set
Alabama (50) 10.9 ± 1.8 −0.22 ± 1.77 0.37 ± 0.24 52 0
Orinda (58) 10.5 ± 1.9 −1.57 ± 1.2 0.51 ± 0.26 47 100
Houston (338) 10.6 ± 2 −1.11 ± 1.72 0.48 ± 0.26 56 100
Irvine (100) 10.6 ± 1.7 −1.98 ± 2.05 0.58 ± 0.29 50 96
Tucson (252) 11.1 ± 1.7 −0.23 ± 2.04 0.44 ± 0.27 57 0

Subset with Parental Factors
Alabama (19) 10.4 ± 1.8 0.07 ± 2.18 0.38 ± 0.28 42 0 26 63 32
Orinda (30) 10.7 ± 1.7 −1.65 ± 1.34 0.53 ± 0.25 57 100 100 100 90
Houston (220) 10.2 ± 1.8 −1.13 ± 1.63 0.47 ± 0.25 56 100 43 38 28
Irvine (37) 10 ± 1.5 −1.66 ± 2.05 0.56 ± 0.32 43 92 95 100 68
Tucson (141) 11.2 ± 1.9 −0.36 ± 1.99 0.46 ± 0.28 57 0 34 62 67