Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2012 Jun 1;7(6):e38234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038234

Table 2. Correction for multiple comparisons on volume and cortical thickness differences.

		Bonferroni correction			FDR correction
Comparison	N^a	p	−log10(p)	N sig^b	p	−log10(p)	N sig^b
Volume
HP vs. Mac (OSX 10.5.8)
v4.3.1	182	0.00027	3.5635	0	-	-	0
v4.5.0	182	0.00027	3.5635	0	-	-	0
v5.0.0	178	0.00028	3.5515	0	-	-	0
Mac (OSX 10.5.8)
v4.3.1 vs. v4.5.0	182	0.00027	3.5635	0	-	-	0
v4.3.1 vs. v5.0.0	178	0.00028	3.5515	49	0.02472	1.6070	88
v4.5.0 vs. v5.0.0	178	0.00028	3.5515	46	0.02640	1.5783	94
HP
v4.3.1 vs. v4.5.0	182	0.00027	3.5635	0	-	-	0
v4.3.1 vs. v5.0.0	178	0.00028	3.5515	46	0.02388	1.6220	85
v4.5.0 vs. v5.0.0	178	0.00028	3.5515	45	0.02556	1.5924	91
MacOSX10.6.4 vs. 10.5.8
v4.3.1	182	0.00027	3.5635	0	-	-	0
v4.5.0	182	0.00027	3.5635	0	-	-	0
v5.0.0	178	0.00028	3.5515	0	-	-	0
Cortical thickness
HP vs. Mac (OSX 10.5.8)
v4.3.1	68	0.00074	3.1335	3	0.00221	2.6564	3
v4.5.0	68	0.00074	3.1335	3	0.00294	2.5315	4
v5.0.0	68	0.00074	3.1335	0	-	-	0
Mac (OSX 10.5.8)
v4.3.1 vs. v4.5.0	68	0.00074	3.1335	0	-	-	0
v4.3.1 vs. v5.0.0	68	0.00074	3.1335	17	0.02500	1.6021	34
v4.5.0 vs. v5.0.0	68	0.00074	3.1335	15	0.02132	1.6711	29
HP
v4.3.1 vs. v4.5.0	68	0.00074	3.1335	0	-	-	0
v4.3.1 vs. v5.0.0	68	0.00074	3.1335	12	0.01985	1.7022	27
v4.5.0 vs. v5.0.0	68	0.00074	3.1335	13	0.01985	1.7022	27
MacOSX10.6.4 vs. 10.5.8
v4.3.1	68	0.00074	3.1335	2	0.00147	2.8325	2
v4.5.0	68	0.00074	3.1335	2	0.00147	2.8325	2
v5.0.0	68	0.00074	3.1335	0	-	-	0

^a

Number of tested structures.

^b

Number of significant structures after application of correction.