Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 1;7(6):e38234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038234

Table 4. Summary of cortical thickness differences.

Signed difference (%) Coefficient of variation (%)a Absolute difference (%) ICCb
Comparison Mean (sd) Range Mean (sd) Range Mean (sd) Range Mean (sd) Range
HP vs. Mac (OSX 10.5.8)
v4.3.1 0.28 (0.48) −0.56–2.02 2.04 (1.07) 0.70–5.27 1.58 (0.81) 0.53–3.96 0.956 (0.026) 0.895–0.995
v4.5.0 0.19 (0.62) −1.87–2.24 2.02 (1.01) 0.81–5.64 1.56 (0.77) 0.61–3.77 0.956 (0.027) 0.885–0.992
v5.0.0 0.08 (0.34) −0.89–0.93 1.89 (0.98) 0.70–5.44 1.45 (0.72) 0.55–4.14 0.958 (0.034) 0.804–0.994
Mac (OSX 10.5.8)
v4.3.1 vs. v4.5.0 −0.05 (0.32) −1.18–1.01 1.61 (0.83) 0.64–4.11 1.06 (0.53) 0.37–2.89 0.974 (0.016) 0.928–0.995
v4.3.1 vs. v5.0.0 −1.05 (1.51) −6.89–2.84 3.14 (1.40) 1.36–7.57 2.80 (1.35) 1.22–7.69 0.869 (0.084) 0.555–0.971
v4.5.0 vs. v5.0.0 −1.00 (1.58) −6.83–3.03 3.13 (1.42) 1.27–9.28 2.80 (1.35) 1.19–7.35 0.872 (0.083) 0.593–0.974
HP
v4.3.1 vs. v4.5.0 0.04 (0.34) −0.69–1.18 1.60 (0.88) 0.63–4.04 1.10 (0.60) 0.42–2.93 0.974 (0.017) 0.924–0.996
v4.3.1 vs. v5.0.0 −0.84 (1.27) −5.17–2.68 3.21 (1.59) 1.23–10.39 2.69 (1.30) 1.10–7.07 0.870 (0.090) 0.569–0.978
v4.5.0 vs. v5.0.0 −0.88 (1.15) −4.82–1.86 3.19 (1.48) 1.38–8.69 2.68 (1.21) 1.21–6.11 0.871 (0.086) 0.592–0.973
MacOSX10.6 vs. 10.5
v4.3.1 0.28 (0.68) −1.58–3.34 2.25 (1.77) 0.60–10.85 1.56 (0.92) 0.47–4.49 0.948 (0.058) 0.670–0.998
v4.5.0 0.12 (0.57) −1.35–2.91 2.17 (1.51) 0.62–9.58 1.58 (0.86) 0.50–4.80 0.952 (0.042) 0.756–0.994
v5.0.0 0.07 (0.39) −0.82–1.23 1.82 (1.00) 0.61–4.64 1.37 (0.73) 0.46–3.59 0.960 (0.038) 0.816–0.996
a

Coefficient of variation is the standard deviation of the signed differences relative to the average of the two cortical thickness measurements.

b

ICC is the intra-class correlation coefficient.