Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2012 May;31(3):243–253. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e31823b8831

TABLE 1.

Interobserver agreement among all 6 observers

Diagnostic category Kappa value (95% confidence interval)
Morphology-only diagnosis Not suspicious for STIC 0.51 (0.33–0.68)
Suspicious for STIC 0.18 (0.08–0.30)
Unequivocal for STIC 0.50 (0.35–0.66)
Overall 0.39 (0.28–0.52)
p53 immunohistochemical score Positive vs. negative 0.49 (0.28–0.67)
Ki-67 immunohistochemical score Low vs. high 0.78 (0.65–0.91)
Final diagnosis Normal/reactive 0.51 (0.32–0.68)
p53 signature 0.51 (0.30–0.72)
STIL 0.27 (0.14–0.42)
STIC 0.67 (0.47–0.81)
Overall 0.49 (0.39–0.62)

Key: STIC, Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma; STIL, serous tubal intraepithelial lesion.