Table 1.
Summary of texture features used in this study as well as their significance for localization of CaP on T2w MRI (numbers in brackets signify how many features of each texture category were computed)
Feature | Implementation | Purpose | Significance for quantifying CaP appearance |
---|---|---|---|
Gabor wavelet transform (48) | Modulation of a complex sinusoid by a Gaussian function | Attempt to match localized frequency characteristics at multiple scales and orientations (26) | Quantify visual processing features used by radiologists when examining appearance of the carcinoma |
Haar wavelet transform (12) | Decomposition coefficients via wavelet decomposition at multiple scales | Attempt decomposition of a signal in the discrete space while offering localization in the time and frequency domains (27) | Differentiate the amorphous nature of the non-CaP regions within foci of low SI |
Haralick texture feature (36) | Construct joint probability distribution of the occurrence of greylevel intensities in an image (spatial relationship between pixels used to restrict counting of greylevel co-occurrences). Statistical features are then calculated from this distribution | Differentiate between different types of texture excellently due to calculation of 2nd order statistics (which quantify perceptual appearance of image) (25) | Useful in differentiating homogeneous low SI regions (CaP) from more hyper-intense appearance of normal prostate |
Greylevel statistical features (14) | Mean, standard deviation as well as derivative features such as via convolution with the Sobel and Kirsch operators are calculated | Provide 1st order information, quantifying macroscopic appearance of image e.g. variation of intensities within image (24) etc. | May help localize regions of significant differences on T2w MR image, accurately detect region boundaries |