. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Feb 20;80(4):588–596. doi: 10.1037/a0027336

Table 1.

Correlations

Variable	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
1. Intervention condition	—
2. Delinquent peer affil. (BL)	.01	—
3. Delinquehnt peer affil. (12 mos.)	−.20^*	.44^***	—
4. General delinquency (BL)	.04	.49^***	.28^**	—
5. General delinquency (24 mos.)	−.06	.14	.27^**	.17^*	—
6. Num. of crim referrals (BL)	−.02	−.01	.03	.13	.12	—
7. Num. of crim referrals (24 mos.)	−.14^†	−.04	.18^*	.10	.15^†	.33^***	—
8. Num. of days locked (BL)	−.09	.12	−.03	.11	.00	.20^*	.05	—	—
9. Num. of days locked (24 mos.)	−.18^*	.19^*	.33^***	.28^**	.25^**	.35^***	.48^***	.31^***	—

N	166	160	146	166	135	166	166	157	130

Note. Spearman’s correlations used for count-based variables (number of criminal referrals, number of days in locked settings).

^†

p < .10.

p < .05.

^**

p < .01.

^***

p < .001.