Skip to main content
. 2012 May 22;2012:506486. doi: 10.1100/2012/506486

Table 2.

Summary of the conditions of the studies.

Study Dialyser Area, m2 N Dialysis machine Blood flow, mL/min
1 AF180 1.8 40 AK200 Fresenius
4008 H
250–300
2 AF180 1.8 7 AK200
300–350
Polyflux17S 1.7 12 Fresenius 4008 H
3 Polyflux17L 1.7 18 AK200
200–350
TCA150G 1.5 3 Fresenius 4008 H
Nephral300 1.3 9
4 F8 1.8 14 Fresenius 4008 H 245–350
F10 2.2 3
FX80 1.8 13
5 FX80 1.8 11 Fresenius 4008 H 245–350
6 FX80 1.8 24 Fresenius 5008 280–350
7 FX800 1.8 24 Fresenius 5008 280–350