Table 1.
Summary of canine surveys in the intervention area of Pancas, Espírito Santo, Brazil in 2009–2011*
Outcome of the follow-up survey | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sampling interval | No. (%) | Sero-positive | Sero-negative | Removed (euthanized) | Died or moved |
Dec 2009–July 2010 | |||||
Pos. | 38 (31) | 5 | 9 | 21 | 3 |
Neg. | 85 (69) | 6 | 51 | 28 | |
Total | 123 | 11 | 60‡ | ||
July 2010–Oct. 2010 | |||||
Pos. | 25 (23) | 2 | 8 | 13 | 2 |
Neg. | 86 (77) | 6 | 58 | 22 | |
Total | 111 | 8† | 66‡ | ||
Oct. 2010–March 2011 | |||||
Pos. | 15 (14) | 5 | 2 | 5 | 3 |
Neg. | 94 (86) | 21 | 37 | 36 | |
Total | 109 | 26† | 39‡ | ||
March 2011 | |||||
Pos. | 37 (40) | ||||
Neg. | 56 (60) | ||||
Total | (93) |
Positive (Pos.) equals the total number of seropositive dogs in the follow-up group (†) plus new dogs that moved into the area that were seropositive. Negative (Neg.) equals the total number of seronegative dogs in the follow-up group (‡) plus new dogs that moved into the area that were seronegative.