Table 1. Percentage of unit-to-unit variance in service user outcomes explained by QuIRC domain scores using three models.
Model | Quality of Life(MANSA) | Autonomy (RCS) | Experience of care(YTC) | Therapeutic Milieu(GMI) | |
QuIRC total | A | 0.1 | 31.2 | 35.6 | 12.1 |
B | 1.7 | 40.6 | 38.2 | 17.4 | |
B-A | 1.6 | 9.4 | 2.6 | 5.3 | |
C | 35.7 | 29.1 | 36.0 | ||
C–B | −4.9 | −9.1 | 18.6 | ||
Therapeutic Environment | A | −1.0 | 17.2 | 19.8 | 4.8 |
B | 3.1 | 34.0 | 28.5 | 13.2 | |
B–A | 4.1 | 16.7 | 8.7 | 8.4 | |
C | 26.9 | 19.4 | 34.3 | ||
C–B | −7.1 | −9.1 | 21.0 | ||
Treatments and Interventions | A | −0.6 | 11.9 | 15.7 | 1.9 |
B | 3.5 | 28.8 | 24.4 | 10.1 | |
B–A | 4.1 | 16.9 | 8.6 | 8.3 | |
C | 22.0 | 15.2 | |||
C–B | −6.8 | −9.1 | |||
Human Rights | A | 2.8 | 31.6 | 24.8 | 9.9 |
B | 3.6 | 40.3 | 28.5 | 16.8 | |
B–A | 0.8 | 8.7 | 3.7 | 6.8 | |
C | 10.5 | 39.3 | 21.6 | 40.8 | |
C–B | 6.8 | −1.0 | −6.9 | 24.1 | |
Recovery Based Practice | A | 3.5 | 30.1 | 28.3 | 15.7 |
B | 2.8 | 39.6 | 31.5 | 20.0 | |
B–A | −0.7 | 9.5 | 3.2 | 4.3 | |
C | 9.8 | 33.9 | 21.7 | 41.5 | |
C–B | 7.0 | −5.7 | −9.8 | 21.5 | |
Social Interface | A | 0.1 | 6.4 | 6.8 | 3.0 |
B | 3.9 | 26.0 | 18.1 | 14.7 | |
B–A | 3.7 | 19.6 | 11.2 | 11.7 | |
C | 17.9 | 7.1 | |||
C–B | −8.1 | −11.0 | |||
Self-Management and Autonomy | A | 10.9 | 55.1 | 36.7 | 23.0 |
B | 9.1 | 56.4 | 35.9 | 25.0 | |
B–A | −1.8 | 1.2 | −0.8 | 2.1 | |
C | 16.8 | 51.9 | 27.5 | 43.8 | |
C–B | 7.7 | −4.4 | −8.3 | 18.8 | |
Living Environment | A | 11.3 | 35.7 | 27.2 | 16.2 |
B | 9.3 | 36.3 | 26.2 | 17.8 | |
B–A | −2.0 | 0.5 | −1.0 | 1.6 | |
C | 15.5 | 35.9 | 19.6 | 32.6 | |
C–B | 6.2 | −0.4 | −6.6 | 14.7 |
QuIRC = Quality Indicator for Rehabilitative Care.
Model A: QuIRC domain score entered as the only independent variable.
Model B: unit type (hospital or community) added to Model A.
Model C: service user characteristics added to Model B (age, GAF and psychosis or not).
Differences in % variance for each model also shown: B–A, C–B.