Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Apr 26;129(6):1570–1578. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.03.023

Table 2.

Comparison of pre- and post- diet therapy peak eosinophil counts/HPF and remission status among diet therapies (n = 98).

Diet Therapy
Elemental (n = 49) SFED (n = 26) Directed (n = 23)

Pre-diet Therapy:
 Peak eosinophil count/HPF
  Median 51.0 76.5* 38.0*
  Interquartile range 28.0 – 90.0 48.0 – 101.0 23.0 – 87.0

Post-diet Therapy:
 Peak eosinophil count/HPF
  Median 1.0 2.5 7.0
  Interquartile range 0 – 3.5 0 – 10.3 0 – 25.0

Remission Types||:

 Remission, n (%) 47 (96) 21 (81) 15 (65)

  Complete remission, n (%) 29 (59) § 10 (39) 7 (30) §

  Partial remission, n (%) 13 (27) 6 (23) 2 (9)

  Partial resolution, n (%) 5 (10) 5 (19) 6 (26)

 Non-remission, n (%) 2 (4) 5 (19) 8 (35)

Remmission types were compared statistically using the Kruskal-Wallis test. If significant differences were detected, pairwise comparisons were performed. Adjusted P-values using Hochberg correction for multiple pairwise comparisons that were significantly different:

*

SFED vs. directed, P = 0.036;

elemental vs. directed, P = 0.01;

elemental vs. directed, P = 0.001;

§

elemental vs. directed, P = 0.04.

||

Remission types were defined as: remission < 15 eosinophils/HPF; complete remission ≤ 1 eosinophil/HPF; partial remission 2–5 eosinophils/HPF; partial resolution 6–14 eosinophils/HPF; and non-remission ≥ 15 eosinophils/HPF.