Table 2.
Comparison of pre- and post- diet therapy peak eosinophil counts/HPF and remission status among diet therapies (n = 98).
Diet Therapy
|
|||
---|---|---|---|
Elemental (n = 49) | SFED (n = 26) | Directed (n = 23) | |
Pre-diet Therapy: | |||
Peak eosinophil count/HPF | |||
Median | 51.0 | 76.5* | 38.0* |
Interquartile range | 28.0 – 90.0 | 48.0 – 101.0 | 23.0 – 87.0 |
Post-diet Therapy: | |||
Peak eosinophil count/HPF | |||
Median | 1.0† | 2.5 | 7.0† |
Interquartile range | 0 – 3.5 | 0 – 10.3 | 0 – 25.0 |
Remission Types||: | |||
Remission, n (%) | 47 (96)‡ | 21 (81) | 15 (65)‡ |
Complete remission, n (%) | 29 (59) § | 10 (39) | 7 (30) § |
Partial remission, n (%) | 13 (27) | 6 (23) | 2 (9) |
Partial resolution, n (%) | 5 (10) | 5 (19) | 6 (26) |
Non-remission, n (%) | 2 (4)‡ | 5 (19) | 8 (35)‡ |
Remmission types were compared statistically using the Kruskal-Wallis test. If significant differences were detected, pairwise comparisons were performed. Adjusted P-values using Hochberg correction for multiple pairwise comparisons that were significantly different:
SFED vs. directed, P = 0.036;
elemental vs. directed, P = 0.01;
elemental vs. directed, P = 0.001;
elemental vs. directed, P = 0.04.
Remission types were defined as: remission < 15 eosinophils/HPF; complete remission ≤ 1 eosinophil/HPF; partial remission 2–5 eosinophils/HPF; partial resolution 6–14 eosinophils/HPF; and non-remission ≥ 15 eosinophils/HPF.