Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 4.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Pharm. 2012 May 15;9(6):1612–1619. doi: 10.1021/mp200612n

Table 2.

Characteristic CE-LIF GU value shifts of the sugar residues.

Sugar residue ΔGU
2 × (α-2,3) sialic acids on FA2G2 −5.33 ± 0.03
1 × (α-2,3) sialic acid on FA2[6]G1, α-1,6 antenna −2.97 ± 0.02
1 × (α-2,3) sialic acid on FA2[3]G1, α-1–3 antenna −3.18 ± 0.02
1 × (α-1,6) fucose on trimannosyl core (M3) +1.01 ± 0.01
1 × (β-1,4) galactose on FA2, α-1,6 antenna +1.10 ± 0.02
1 × (β-1,4) galactose on FA2, α-1,3 antenna +1.42 ± 0.02
1 × (α-1,3) galactose on FA2G2, α-1,6 antenna +1.01 ± 0.01
1 × (α-1,3) galactose on FA2G2, α-1,3 antenna +1.30 ± 0.01
1 × (β-1,2) GlcNAc on trimannosyl core, α-1,6 antenna +0.83 ± 0.03
1 × (β-1,2) GlcNAc on trimannosyl core , α-1,3 antenna +0.95 ± 0.02
1 × (α-1,3) Mannose (1–3) on FM2 +1.10 ± 0.01