Table 2.
Multivariate analyses relating family structure to disability pension in a 1-year and 5-year follow-up during 1993–2003 among employed and not employed young women
Employed |
Not employed |
|||
Exposed cases | HR (95% CI) | Exposed cases | HR (95% CI) | |
One-year follow-up | ||||
Family structure* | ||||
Total | 19 645 | 19 960 | ||
Cohabiting + no children | 785 | 1.00 | 654 | 1.00 |
Cohabiting + children | 9320 | 0.80 (0.74 to 0.86) | 6545 | 0.88 (0.81 to 0.96) |
Lone + no children | 5853 | 1.08 (1.00 to 1.17) | 8172 | 2.05 (1.89 to 2.22) |
Lone + children | 3687 | 1.35 (1.25 to 1.46) | 4589 | 1.64 (1.51 to 1.78) |
Family structure† | ||||
Total | 19 539 | 19 742 | ||
Cohabiting + no children | 780 | 1.00 | 648 | 1.00 |
Cohabiting + children | 9268 | 0.73 (0.68 to 0.78) | 6460 | 0.63 (0.59 to 0.69) |
Lone + no children | 5835 | 1.07 (0.99 to 1.16) | 8099 | 1.35 (1.24 to 1.46) |
Lone + children | 3656 | 1.23 (1.14 to 1.33) | 4535 | 0.99 (0.91 to 1.08) |
Five-year follow-up | ||||
Family structure* | ||||
Total | 20 170 | 9598 | ||
Cohabiting + no children | 616 | 1.00 | 241 | 1.00 |
Cohabiting + children | 9893 | 1.31 (1.21 to 1.42) | 3954 | 1.39 (1.22 to 1.58) |
Lone + no children | 5945 | 1.10 (1.01 to 1.19) | 3070 | 1.89 (1.66 to 2.16) |
Lone + children | 3716 | 2.35 (2.16 to 2.57) | 2333 | 2.45 (2.15 to 2.80) |
Family structure† | ||||
Total | 20 057 | 9598 | ||
Cohabiting + no children | 615 | 1.00 | 241 | 1.00 |
Cohabiting + children | 9804 | 1.13 (1.04 to 1.23) | 3954 | 1.09 (0.95 to 1.24) |
Lone + no children | 5938 | 1.07 (0.98 to 1.16) | 3070 | 1.44 (1.26 to 1.65) |
Lone + children | 3700 | 1.69 (1.55 to 1.85) | 2333 | 1.62 (1.41 to 1.85) |
5-year follow-up ‘healthy’ at start of follow-up | ||||
Family structure† | ||||
Total | 6705 | 3871 | ||
Cohabiting + no children | 215 | 1.00 | 117 | 1.00 |
Cohabiting + children | 2778 | 1.24 (1.08 to 1.43) | 1447 | 1.18 (0.97 to 1.42) |
Lone + no children | 2618 | 1.23 (1.07 to 1.42) | 1467 | 1.83 (1.51 to 2.22) |
Lone + children | 1094 | 1.91 (1.64 to 2.22) | 840 | 1.94 (1.59 to 2.36) |
Adjusted for age.
The model for employed included age, residential area, country of birth, education, income, employment sector and days of unemployment. The model for not employed included age, residential area, country of birth and education.