Skip to main content
. 2012 May 30;2(3):e000840. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000840

Table 2.

Multivariate analyses relating family structure to disability pension in a 1-year and 5-year follow-up during 1993–2003 among employed and not employed young women

Employed
Not employed
Exposed cases HR (95% CI) Exposed cases HR (95% CI)
One-year follow-up
 Family structure*
  Total 19 645 19 960
  Cohabiting + no children 785 1.00 654 1.00
  Cohabiting + children 9320 0.80 (0.74 to 0.86) 6545 0.88 (0.81 to 0.96)
  Lone + no children 5853 1.08 (1.00 to 1.17) 8172 2.05 (1.89 to 2.22)
  Lone + children 3687 1.35 (1.25 to 1.46) 4589 1.64 (1.51 to 1.78)
 Family structure
  Total 19 539 19 742
  Cohabiting + no children 780 1.00 648 1.00
  Cohabiting + children 9268 0.73 (0.68 to 0.78) 6460 0.63 (0.59 to 0.69)
  Lone + no children 5835 1.07 (0.99 to 1.16) 8099 1.35 (1.24 to 1.46)
  Lone + children 3656 1.23 (1.14 to 1.33) 4535 0.99 (0.91 to 1.08)
Five-year follow-up
 Family structure*
  Total 20 170 9598
  Cohabiting + no children 616 1.00 241 1.00
  Cohabiting + children 9893 1.31 (1.21 to 1.42) 3954 1.39 (1.22 to 1.58)
  Lone + no children 5945 1.10 (1.01 to 1.19) 3070 1.89 (1.66 to 2.16)
  Lone + children 3716 2.35 (2.16 to 2.57) 2333 2.45 (2.15 to 2.80)
 Family structure
  Total 20 057 9598
  Cohabiting + no children 615 1.00 241 1.00
  Cohabiting + children 9804 1.13 (1.04 to 1.23) 3954 1.09 (0.95 to 1.24)
  Lone + no children 5938 1.07 (0.98 to 1.16) 3070 1.44 (1.26 to 1.65)
  Lone + children 3700 1.69 (1.55 to 1.85) 2333 1.62 (1.41 to 1.85)
5-year follow-up ‘healthy’ at start of follow-up
 Family structure
  Total 6705 3871
  Cohabiting + no children 215 1.00 117 1.00
  Cohabiting + children 2778 1.24 (1.08 to 1.43) 1447 1.18 (0.97 to 1.42)
  Lone + no children 2618 1.23 (1.07 to 1.42) 1467 1.83 (1.51 to 2.22)
  Lone + children 1094 1.91 (1.64 to 2.22) 840 1.94 (1.59 to 2.36)
*

Adjusted for age.

The model for employed included age, residential area, country of birth, education, income, employment sector and days of unemployment. The model for not employed included age, residential area, country of birth and education.