Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 4.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2011 May 31;50(28):6392–6395. doi: 10.1002/anie.201102405

Table 2.

Optimization of reactant, ligand, and reaction conditions for the enantioselective Mukaiyama-Michael addition.[a]

graphic file with name nihms376649u2.jpg
entry 1 ligand solvent additive yield (%)[b] ee (%)[c]
1 1a L1 DCM - 43 54
2 1b L1 DCM - 64 12
3 1c L1 DCM - 33 50
4 1d L1 DCM - 42 93
5 1d L2 DCM - 30 65
6 1d L3 DCM - 33 76
7 1d L4 DCM - 40 87
8 1d L5 DCM - 34 88
9 1d L6 DCM - <5 ND
10 1d L1 DCM HFIP (1.0 eq) 67 83
11 1d L1 DCM 4Å (0.1g) 44 94
12 1d L1 THF 4Å (0.1g) <5 ND
13 1d L1 Toluene 4Å (0.1g) 35 90
14[d] 1d L1 DCM HFIP (1.0 eq) 78 93
15[e] 1d L1 DCM HFIP & 4Å 81 94
[a]

Reactions were performed as described in Table 1. The chiral catalyst was prepared according to ref 12.

[b]

Isolated yield of 8 after chromatography.

[c]

Determined by chiral HPLC (See supporting information).

[d]

30 mol% Catalyst was used.

[e]

Catalyst was prepared in a glove box, and the reaction was run for three days.