Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Popul Res Policy Rev. 2012 Feb;31(1):1–30. doi: 10.1007/s11113-011-9221-6

Table 7.

First and second stage regressions to explore selection issue

I. First stage regression, binomial probit of worked and worked full-time while pregnant:

Worked Worked full-time
Disabled before first birth −0.5315c (0.0808) −0.5400c (0.0823)
Black, non-Hispanic −0.3078c (0.0354) −0.2345c (0.0350)
Hispanic −0.5771c (0.0353) −0.4789c (0.0356)
Other race, non-Hispanic −0.4552c (0.0462) −0.3872c (0.0454)
Married, spouse present −0.0575b (0.0271) −0.0496a (0.0265)
Potential experience 0.0353c (0.0065) 0.0408c (0.0064)
Education: less than high school degree −0.6039c (0.0458) −0.5678c (0.0468)
Education: some college 0.3314c (0.0315) 0.2897c (0.0308)
Education: college degree or higher 0.5590c (0.0462) 0.4605cc (0.0442)
Had first birth before completing schooling −0.1373c (0.0294) −0.1617c (0.0287)
Lagged employment to population ratio, males aged 25–64 −0.0028 (0.0101) −0.0076 (0.0097)
Employment to population ratio, males aged 25–64 0.0340c (0.0115) 0.0310c (0.0111)
(0.1923) (0.1845)
Constant −2.3660b (1.1886) −1.9304a (1.1609)
Observations 14008 14008
Log likelihood −7,670 −8,255
II. Second stage regression, multinomial probit estimates

Part-time vs. Full-time Stay home vs. Full-time


No
selection
term
Worked Worked
full-time
No
selection
term
Worked Worked
full-time
Inverse Mills ratio 1.7868b (0.7797) 1.9021c (0.7370) 0.5958 (0.7078) 0.7431 (0.6954)
FMLA in effect 0.4163b (0.2069) 0.4249b (0.2070) 0.4251b (0.2070) 0.2864 (0.1904) 0.2893 (0.1904) 0.2898 (0.1904)
FMLA time trend (1993–2002) −0.0462 (0.0703) −0.0508 (0.0704) −0.0519 (0.0704) −0.0699 (0.0665) −0.0715 (0.0666) −0.0720 (0.0666)
Square of FMLA time trend (1993–2002) 0.0106a (0.0058) 0.0109a (0.0058) 0.0110a (0.0058) 0.0146c (0.0055) 0.0147c (0.0055) 0.0147c (0.0055)
State law in effect 0.3267c (0.0757) 0.3243c (0.0757) 0.3244c (0.0757) 0.1820b (0.0739) 0.1808b (0.0739) 0.1807b (0.0739)
Log likelihood −6,629 −6,626 −6,626 −6,629 −6,626 −6,626

Note: Regression includes controls for birth cohort and age at birth

Standard errors in parentheses

a

significant at 10%;

b

significant at 5%;

c

significant at 1%

Note: Includes same controls as Table 4, model 1(c)