Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2011 Oct 1;137(3-4):157–165. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.08.013

Table 2.

Definitions of behavioral and compatibility categories

A. Behavioral Categories
Social affiliation Groom other Picking, stroking, or licking partner’s fur.
Affiliative to partner Look/approach in a nonaggressive manner; showing “social interest.” Overt affiliative gestures: lipsmack, present side, chest, or other body part for grooming.
Affiliative to other Overt affiliative gestures only; lipsmack, presenting body part for grooming.
Social Agonism Agonism to partner Aggressive and submissive behavior: lunge, hit cage, open mouth threat, chase, grimace, crouch, screech vocalization, persistent retreat.
Agonism to other Lunge, hit cage, open mouth threat, finger-fighting over top/around front/through sides of cages.
Contact Aggression Hitting, grabbing, hair pulling, biting directed to partner.
Resource monopolization Take item (food or toy) away when it is not offered. Horde item or prevent other animal from approaching it. When an animal takes a biscuit from another animal’s cage (applies to GC housing only).
Nonsocial Groom self Picking, stroking, or licking own fur.
Abnormal Self-abusive behaviors, floating limb activities, overgrooming, locomotor stereotypy, miscellaneous self-stimulation stereotypies.
Tension Cage shake, scratch, yawn, tooth grind or chomp.
Manipulate Manipulate toy, enrichment device, cage part, or bedding.
Miscellaneous active Locomotion: walk, climb, jump, scoot, travel at least one “butt” profile distance. Eat/Drink: Pick up food item, handle food, put food item in mouth or dislodge from cheek pouch. Drink from lixit. Other Active: Miscellaneous active movements not included in other codes.
Inactive Sleep, sit, stand, lie, passive visual exploration, chewing in the absence of active food handling or pushing food from check pouch.
B. Compatibility categories
Very compatible ++ Animals are given this score if they engage in social grooming at least once during the interval and no agonistic behaviors are observed.
Somewhat compatible + One or both display affiliative behaviors without agonistic behaviors but do not groom. Or if they display more affiliative than agonistic behaviors (no contact aggression) towards each other, regardless of grooming.
Neutral ig Neither display affiliative or agonistic behaviors toward each other, or one shows only affiliative social interest and the other ignores.
Somewhat incompatible - Animals display more agonistic behaviors (no contact aggression) than affiliative behaviors.
Incompatible -- Animals display many agonistic behaviors or engage in contact fighting. Partners that groom or display some affiliative behaviors are rated as incompatible if any contact aggression occurs.