Table 1.
sample | Pd foil | Au foil | bioPd–Au |
---|---|---|---|
NPd−Pd | 12a | 1.9 (4) | |
NPd−Au | 1.2b | ||
NAu−Pd | 0.8 (2) | ||
NAu−Au | 12a | 9.9 (6) | |
NPd−M | 3.1 (4) | ||
NAu−M | 10.7 (6) | ||
cNM−M | 7.8 (6) | ||
RPd−Pd (Å) | 2.74 (14) | 2.76 (16) | |
RPd−Au (Å) | 2.75 (17) | ||
RAu−Au (Å) | 2.84 (19) | 2.84 (18) | |
σ2Pd−Pd (Å2) | 0.0058 (58) | 0.0060 (6) | |
σ2Pd−Au (Å2) | 0.0077 (72) | 0.0039 (4) | |
σ2Au−Au (Å2) | 0.0088 (9) |
aValue fixed for calculation.
bCoordination numbers were constrained in the fits to be varied in accordance with equation: NPd−Au/NAu−Pd = XAu/XPd.
cNM−M = XAuNAu−M + XPdNPd−M (where XAu and XPd are the molar composition of Au and Pd, respectively).