Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 22;13:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-43

Table 3.

Codon usage bias across all possible quantitative relationships among positional GC contents

GC content Purine content = 0.3 Purine content = 0.5 Purine content = 0.7
1st 2nd 3rd CDC Scaled
Nc
Scaled
Nc'
CDC Scaled
Nc
Scaled
Nc'
CDC Scaled
Nc
Scaled
Nc'

0.3 0.5 0.7 0.00153 0.34160 0.23472 0.00586 0.24586 0.23332 0.00481 0.39716 0.21314

0.3 0.7 0.5 0.00147 0.15648 0.05716 0.00551 0.04827 0.06330 0.00498 0.24616 0.05866

0.5 0.3 0.7 0.00146 0.36662 0.19363 0.00470 0.20034 0.17544 0.00441 0.34555 0.17306

0.5 0.7 0.3 0.00143 0.35276 0.21224 0.00519 0.19619 0.21974 0.00417 0.34831 0.21815

0.7 0.3 0.5 0.00069 0.21330 0.01419 0.00236 0.02999 0.02692 0.00233 0.16172 0.03574

0.7 0.5 0.3 0.00066 0.38224 0.22121 0.00257 0.22392 0.23947 0.00236 0.33561 0.24588

Sequences with 100000 codons were simulated. The compositions in the Med-1 set (0.3, 0.5 and 0.7) were used. GC content was considered non-uniform at three codon positions, whereas purine content was set uniform at three codon positions. The expected value of codon usage bias is zero so that these estimated values are also the deviations from the expected.