Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 1;470(7):1814–1825. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2274-y

Table 4.

Demographic and implant data for the CCK and PS tibial inserts

Implant design Number of explants Patient age at surgery (years)* Implantation time (months)* Sex (male/female) Side (left/right) Primary/revision cases Component thickness (mm)* Shelf time before implantation (months)*,† Cemented femoral and/or tibial component Material of femoral component
CCK Insall/Burstein® II 23 68.6 ± 13.8
(37–86)
19.7 ± 17.9
(0.8–59.7)
8/15 14/9 3/19 16.8 ± 4.8
(10–25)
15.1 ± 10.8
(6.2–46.2)
All yes All Co-Cr-Mo
PS Insall/Burstein® II 15 66.9 ± 10.1
(45–76)
16.1 ± 12.3
(3.4–39.8)
4/11 11/4 13/2 14.8 ± 6.3
(8–25)
5.1 ± 5.9
(1.6–15.4)
All yes All Co-Cr-Mo
p value 0.194 0.729 0.581 0.599 0.429 < 0.001 0.728 0.074 1 1

* Values are expressed as mean ± SD, with the range in parentheses; known for 12 CCK and five PS components; comparing the CCK and PS groups; the two-tailed t-test was used for the continuous variables and the chi-square test for the frequency values; CCK = constrained condylar knee; PS = posterior-stabilized.