Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2012 Jan 16;27(3):691–700. doi: 10.1037/a0026714

Table 5.

Indirect Effects from the Final Path Model

Indirect Effect Std.
Estimate
Est. /
S.E.
p 95% CI
Age → WM → Shallow Strategy → Association HR −.034 −2.00 .043 −.067 to −.001
WM→ Shallow Strategy → Association HR .070 1.94 .050 .000 to .129
Age → WM → Deep Strategy → Association HR −.034 −2.13 .032 −.065 to −.003
WM → Deep Strategy → Association HR .070 2.33 .020 .011 to .129
Age → WM → Association FAR .135 2.81 .005 .041 to .229
Age → WM → Shallow Strategy .141 3.20 .001 .055 to .227
Age → WM → Deep Strategy −.115 −2.45 .014 −.207 to −.023

S.E. = Standard error, WM – working memory, HR – hit rate, FAR – false alarm rate, CI – confidence interval.