Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 4;83(3):207–213. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.693016

Table 4.

Survival of HRA and THA, the reference group. Endpoint was defined as revision of any component for any reason. Survival rates were obtained from the Kaplan-Meier analysis

A B C D E F G H I J
BHR 1,856 4.4 (0.0–9.0) 1,253 97 (96–98) 668 96 (95–97) 111 95 (94–97) 0.72 (0.56–0.94) 0.02
ASR 995 3.1 (0.3–5.8) 440 95 (93–97) 39 92 (89–95) 1.28 (0.95–1.73) 0.1
ReCap 657 2.5 (0.4–5.7) 190 96 (94–98) 18 0.94 (0.59–1.48) 0.8
Conserve Plus 469 2.1 (0.4–4.7) 65 97 (95–98) 1.05 (0.61–1.83) 0.9
Durom 333 3.2 (0.2–5.1) 144 96 (94–98) 1 1.03 (0.60–1.74) 0.9
Corin (Cormet) 91 5.6 (0.2–7.6) 87 96 (92–100) 52 92 (86–99) 5 1.11 (0.50–2.48) 0.8
All HRAs 4,401 3.5 (0.0–9.0) 2,177 96 (96–97) 777 94 (93–95) 115 94 (93–95) 0.93 (0.78–1.10) 0.4
All THAs 48,409 3.9 (0.0–9.0) 25,482 96 (96–97) 14,607 95 (95–96) 5,601 94 (94–95) 1.0

A n

B Mean follow-up (years)

C At risk, 4-year

D 4-year survival (95% CI)

E At risk, 6-year

F 6-year survival (95% CI)

G At risk, 8-year

H 8-year survival (95% CI)

I Adjusted risk ratio (RR) for revision (95% CI) from the Cox regression analysis (HRAs compared to THAs; with adjustment made for age, sex, diagnosis, and implant).

J p-value